
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Core i7-4930K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +163.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $341 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $670 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 717.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $670 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 130W, a 5W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i7-4930K
2013Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,379 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($670 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i5-13600K
2022Core i7-4930K
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +163.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $341 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $670 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 717.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $670 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 130W, a 5W reduction.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,379 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($670 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Core i7-4930K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-4930K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-4930K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 95 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-4930K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 234 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-4930K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 234 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Core i7-4930K

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Core i7-4930K
Core i7-4930K
The Core i7-4930K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,379 points. Launch price was $670.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i7-4930K offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4930K — a 26.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-4930K uses Ivy Bridge-E (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Core i7-4930K's 9,379 — a 120.2% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-4930K.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-4930K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+31% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+3% | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB+100% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Ivy Bridge-E (2013) |
| PassMark | 37,655+301% | 9,379 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-4930K uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-4930K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) / not specified (Core i7-4930K). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i7-4930K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-4930K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Core i7-4930K debuted at $670. On MSRP ($329 vs $670), the Core i5-13600K is $341 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 14.0 pts/$ for the Core i7-4930K — making the Core i5-13600K the 156.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-4930K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-51% | $670 |
| Performance per Dollar | 114.5+718% | 14.0 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













