
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Core i7-14700HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 33 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core i7-14700HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 55W.
Core i7-14700HX
2024Why buy it
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 125W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (37,173 vs 37,655).
Core i5-13600K
2022Core i7-14700HX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 125W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 33 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core i7-14700HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (37,173 vs 37,655).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Core i7-14700HX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-14700HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-14700HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 299 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 136 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-14700HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 647 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 404 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 490 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 426 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 370 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 338 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 289 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-14700HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 924 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 841 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 725 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 651 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 694 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 599 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 528 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 445 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 389 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Core i7-14700HX

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Core i7-14700HX
Core i7-14700HX
The Core i7-14700HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,173 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i7-14700HX offers 20 cores / 28 threads — the Core i7-14700HX has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-14700HX — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-14700HX (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-14700HX uses Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Core i7-14700HX's 37,173 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-14700HX.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-14700HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 20 / 28+43% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.4 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+67% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 33 MB (total)+38% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) |
| PassMark | 37,655+1% | 37,173 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,871 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 17,358 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-14700HX uses FCBGA1964 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and Mobile (Core i7-14700HX).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-14700HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA1964 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Core i7-14700HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and UHD Graphics (Core i7-14700HX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-14700HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | UHD Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













