
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Core i7-13800H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core i7-13800H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core i7-13800H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Core i7-13800H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,349 vs 37,655).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-13600K
2022Core i7-13800H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core i7-13800H needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core i7-13800H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,349 vs 37,655).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Core i7-13800H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-13800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-13800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 521 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 533 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 468 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 234 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-13800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 648 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 467 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 491 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 370 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 338 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 289 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-13800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 659 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 659 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 659 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 659 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 659 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 551 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 393 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Core i7-13800H

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Core i7-13800H
Core i7-13800H
The Core i7-13800H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 26,349 points. Launch price was $457.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-13600K and Core i7-13800H share an identical 14-core/20-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13800H — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-13800H (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-13800H uses Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Core i7-13800H's 26,349 — a 35.3% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13800H.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-13800H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 14 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.2 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+40% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 37,655+43% | 26,349 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-13800H uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-13800H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA1744 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) / not specified (Core i7-13800H). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i7-13800H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-13800H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













