
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Xeon 6349P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon 6349P.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6349P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 25,953).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Xeon 6349P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon 6349P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Xeon 6349P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon 6349P.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6349P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 25,953).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Xeon 6349P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6349P better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Xeon 6349P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 96 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Xeon 6349P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 528 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 451 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 331 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 227 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Xeon 6349P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 649 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 649 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 583 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 649 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 560 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 517 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 462 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 337 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Xeon 6349P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 649 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 649 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 649 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 649 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 639 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 548 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 557 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 495 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 369 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Xeon 6349P

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Xeon 6349P
Xeon 6349P
The Xeon 6349P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 25,953 points. Launch price was $509.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-12400F and Xeon 6349P share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5.4 GHz on the Xeon 6349P — a 20.4% clock advantage for the Xeon 6349P (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon 6349P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Xeon 6349P's 25,953 — a 28.2% lead for the Xeon 6349P. Both processors carry 18 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon 6349P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz+23% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+44% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 25,953+33% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon 6349P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Xeon 6349P). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon 6349P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












