PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $11,525 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $11,699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 645.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 15.1 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $11,699 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,380 vs 180,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX, which brings 96 cores / 192 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.4% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 96 cores / 192 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.1 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($11,699 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $11,525 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $11,699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 645.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 15.1 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $11,699 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.4% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 96 cores / 192 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,380 vs 180,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX, which brings 96 cores / 192 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.1 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($11,699 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX better than Core i5-12400F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-12400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 23.4% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 384 MB vs 18 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is the better fit. You are getting 1354% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 96 cores and 192 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 2033.3% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-12400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is 6623.6% more expensive on MSRP at $11,699 MSRP versus $174 MSRP, and it gives you a 23.4% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-12400F is also 645.0% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 15.1 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022), 3D V-Cache and a much larger 384 MB L3 cache instead of 18 MB, more multi-core headroom with 96 cores / 192 threads instead of 6/12, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-12400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
1080p
low	183 FPS	300 FPS
medium	168 FPS	279 FPS
high	139 FPS	230 FPS
ultra	119 FPS	194 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	266 FPS
medium	132 FPS	223 FPS
high	106 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	152 FPS
4K
low	87 FPS	184 FPS
medium	81 FPS	154 FPS
high	64 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	104 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
1080p
low	471 FPS	785 FPS
medium	397 FPS	675 FPS
high	341 FPS	531 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	457 FPS
1440p
low	407 FPS	655 FPS
medium	351 FPS	584 FPS
high	309 FPS	470 FPS
ultra	265 FPS	377 FPS
4K
low	282 FPS	366 FPS
medium	248 FPS	331 FPS
high	229 FPS	303 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	263 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
1080p
low	488 FPS	887 FPS
medium	488 FPS	726 FPS
high	488 FPS	653 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	555 FPS
1440p
low	488 FPS	692 FPS
medium	488 FPS	566 FPS
high	485 FPS	497 FPS
ultra	434 FPS	418 FPS
4K
low	442 FPS	488 FPS
medium	389 FPS	405 FPS
high	337 FPS	363 FPS
ultra	274 FPS	302 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
1080p
low	488 FPS	1115 FPS
medium	488 FPS	1001 FPS
high	488 FPS	877 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	789 FPS
1440p
low	488 FPS	878 FPS
medium	488 FPS	773 FPS
high	488 FPS	677 FPS
ultra	473 FPS	589 FPS
4K
low	488 FPS	641 FPS
medium	450 FPS	571 FPS
high	391 FPS	506 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 176,281 points. Launch price was $11,700.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX has 90 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX — a 20.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX's 176,281 — a 160.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,380 vs 180,000 (174.3% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,700 vs 3,000, a 55.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 657 vs 30,170 (191.5% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 384 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	96 / 192+1500%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	5.4 GHz+23%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)	384 MB (total)+2033%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Shimada Peak (2025)
PassMark	19,532	176,281+803%
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,380	180,000+1354%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,700	3,000+76%
Geekbench 6 Multi	657	30,170+4492%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-12400F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX).

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
Socket	LGA1700	sTR5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	2048 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX targets High-end Workstation / AI Rendering. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	true
Target Use	Gaming Performance/Value	High-end Workstation / AI Rendering

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX debuted at $11699. On MSRP ($174 vs $11699), the Core i5-12400F is $11525 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 15.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX — making the Core i5-12400F the 152.7% better value option.