
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 35,133).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2024Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 890M, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2024Why buy it
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 890M, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 35,133).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 351 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 230 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 135 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 758 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 602 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 443 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 677 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 400 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 491 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 309 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 878 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 811 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 695 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 627 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 759 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 583 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 515 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 519 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 369 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.


Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 35,133 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 uses Strix Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370's 35,133 — a 57.1% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+25% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Strix Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 35,133+80% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus 7500 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 — the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 supports up to 256 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370) — the Core i5-12400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and FP8 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370).
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | 7500+149900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+52428700% | 256 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370). The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 890M), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 rivals Core Ultra 9 185H.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon 890M |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($174 vs $0), the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is $174 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3 | — |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











