PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $155 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Delivers 151.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 44.7 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,699 vs 19,532).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.7 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $155 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Delivers 151.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 44.7 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,699 vs 19,532).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.7 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-12400F better than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700?

Yes. Core i5-12400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 7.0% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data, 32.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-12400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 7.0% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-12400F is the better fit. You are getting 32.9% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-12400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-12400F is $155 cheaper on MSRP at $174 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it gives you a 7.0% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 151.2% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 44.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-12400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-12400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
1080p
low	183 FPS	176 FPS
medium	168 FPS	154 FPS
high	139 FPS	127 FPS
ultra	119 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	145 FPS
medium	132 FPS	121 FPS
high	106 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	87 FPS	66 FPS
medium	81 FPS	59 FPS
high	64 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	37 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
1080p
low	471 FPS	286 FPS
medium	397 FPS	253 FPS
high	341 FPS	226 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	186 FPS
1440p
low	407 FPS	253 FPS
medium	351 FPS	229 FPS
high	309 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	265 FPS	167 FPS
4K
low	282 FPS	183 FPS
medium	248 FPS	170 FPS
high	229 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	124 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
1080p
low	488 FPS	367 FPS
medium	488 FPS	367 FPS
high	488 FPS	367 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	367 FPS
1440p
low	488 FPS	367 FPS
medium	488 FPS	367 FPS
high	485 FPS	367 FPS
ultra	434 FPS	319 FPS
4K
low	442 FPS	363 FPS
medium	389 FPS	295 FPS
high	337 FPS	264 FPS
ultra	274 FPS	214 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
1080p
low	488 FPS	367 FPS
medium	488 FPS	367 FPS
high	488 FPS	367 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	367 FPS
1440p
low	488 FPS	367 FPS
medium	488 FPS	367 FPS
high	488 FPS	367 FPS
ultra	473 FPS	367 FPS
4K
low	488 FPS	367 FPS
medium	450 FPS	367 FPS
high	391 FPS	363 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	313 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,699 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 — a 17.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700's 14,699 — a 28.2% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+19%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)+13%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512K (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	19,532+33%	14,699
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,380	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,700	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	657	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Socket	LGA1700	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 1700). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Integrated GPU	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Gaming Performance/Value	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 debuted at $329. On MSRP ($174 vs $329), the Core i5-12400F is $155 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 44.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 — making the Core i5-12400F the 86.1% better value option.