Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS

Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS

6 Cores12 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2024

Popular choices:

i5-12400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 21,408).
  • Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS better than Core i5-12400F?
Yes. Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 6.7% average FPS lead across 6 shared CPU game tests in our data, 9.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 6.7% more average FPS across 6 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS is the better fit. You are getting 9.6% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-12400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $174 MSRP, and it gives you a 6.7% average FPS lead across 6 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-12400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen 5 PRO 8640HS
1080p
low183 FPS262 FPS
medium168 FPS238 FPS
high139 FPS203 FPS
ultra119 FPS173 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS230 FPS
medium132 FPS189 FPS
high106 FPS156 FPS
ultra89 FPS136 FPS
4K
low87 FPS156 FPS
medium81 FPS130 FPS
high64 FPS101 FPS
ultra49 FPS88 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen 5 PRO 8640HS
1080p
low471 FPS374 FPS
medium397 FPS314 FPS
high341 FPS278 FPS
ultra301 FPS240 FPS
1440p
low407 FPS316 FPS
medium351 FPS276 FPS
high309 FPS251 FPS
ultra265 FPS212 FPS
4K
low282 FPS237 FPS
medium248 FPS211 FPS
high229 FPS197 FPS
ultra196 FPS164 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen 5 PRO 8640HS
1080p
low488 FPS535 FPS
medium488 FPS535 FPS
high488 FPS535 FPS
ultra488 FPS535 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS535 FPS
medium488 FPS535 FPS
high485 FPS511 FPS
ultra434 FPS437 FPS
4K
low442 FPS482 FPS
medium389 FPS415 FPS
high337 FPS355 FPS
ultra274 FPS293 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen 5 PRO 8640HS
1080p
low488 FPS535 FPS
medium488 FPS535 FPS
high488 FPS535 FPS
ultra488 FPS535 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS535 FPS
medium488 FPS535 FPS
high488 FPS535 FPS
ultra473 FPS535 FPS
4K
low488 FPS535 FPS
medium450 FPS531 FPS
high391 FPS473 FPS
ultra330 FPS411 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS

The Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,408 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-12400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS's 21,408 — a 9.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS.

FeatureCore i5-12400FRyzen 5 PRO 8640HS
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
4.9 GHz+11%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.5 GHz+40%
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)+13%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+25%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
PassMark
19,532
21,408+10%
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380
Geekbench 6 Single
1,700
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-12400FRyzen 5 PRO 8640HS
Socket
LGA1700
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureCore i5-12400FRyzen 5 PRO 8640HS
Integrated GPU
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming Performance/Value