
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

M2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +18.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike M2.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while M2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β225% higher power demand at 65W vs 20W.
M2
2022Why buy it
- β Draws 20W instead of 65W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (14,933 vs 19,532).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022M2
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +18.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike M2.
Why buy it
- β Draws 20W instead of 65W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while M2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β225% higher power demand at 65W vs 20W.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (14,933 vs 19,532).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than M2?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | M2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | M2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 106 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | M2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 363 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 221 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | M2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 328 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and M2

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.
M2
M2
The M2 is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 10 June 2022 (3 years ago). It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.48 GHz. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 14,933 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the M2 offers 8 cores / 8 threads β the M2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 3.48 GHz on the M2 β a 23.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.424 GHz). The Core i5-12400F is built on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the M2's 14,933 β a 26.7% lead for the Core i5-12400F.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 8+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+26% | 3.48 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+3% | 2.424 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | β |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 20 MB+1500% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | β |
| PassMark | 19,532+31% | 14,933 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the M2 uses none (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (M2). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | β |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












