PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $57 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $231 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 225F.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225F across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,380 vs 17,050).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 112.3 vs 136.5 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $231 MSRP).

Core Ultra 5 225F

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.4% higher average FPS across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Delivers 21.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 136.5 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($231 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
32.8% HIGHER MSRP
$231 MSRPvs$174 MSRP
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Core Ultra 5 225F

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $57 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $231 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 225F.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.4% higher average FPS across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Delivers 21.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 136.5 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($231 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225F across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,380 vs 17,050).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 112.3 vs 136.5 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $231 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌
32.8% HIGHER MSRP
$231 MSRPvs$174 MSRP
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 225F better than Core i5-12400F?

Yes. Core Ultra 5 225F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 12.4% average FPS lead across 40 shared CPU game tests in our data, 37.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 61.5% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 5 225F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 12.4% more average FPS across 40 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 225F is the better fit. You are getting 37.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 10 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 5 225F is the smarter buy today. Core Ultra 5 225F is 32.8% more expensive on MSRP at $231 MSRP versus $174 MSRP, and it gives you a 12.4% average FPS lead across 40 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 21.6% better value on MSRP (136.5 vs 112.3 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1700 + DDR5 setup, Core i5-12400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 225F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 10 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-12400F Benchmark Check

Core Ultra 5 225F Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core Ultra 5 225F
1080p
low	183 FPS	256 FPS
medium	168 FPS	244 FPS
high	139 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	119 FPS	176 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	219 FPS
medium	132 FPS	187 FPS
high	106 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	133 FPS
4K
low	87 FPS	150 FPS
medium	81 FPS	127 FPS
high	64 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	86 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core Ultra 5 225F

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core Ultra 5 225F
1080p
low	471 FPS	603 FPS
medium	397 FPS	512 FPS
high	341 FPS	421 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	378 FPS
1440p
low	407 FPS	501 FPS
medium	351 FPS	441 FPS
high	309 FPS	372 FPS
ultra	265 FPS	319 FPS
4K
low	282 FPS	301 FPS
medium	248 FPS	266 FPS
high	229 FPS	248 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	218 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core Ultra 5 225F

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core Ultra 5 225F
1080p
low	488 FPS	789 FPS
medium	488 FPS	680 FPS
high	488 FPS	609 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	522 FPS
1440p
low	488 FPS	725 FPS
medium	488 FPS	588 FPS
high	485 FPS	515 FPS
ultra	434 FPS	439 FPS
4K
low	442 FPS	504 FPS
medium	389 FPS	422 FPS
high	337 FPS	377 FPS
ultra	274 FPS	318 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core Ultra 5 225F

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core Ultra 5 225F
1080p
low	488 FPS	789 FPS
medium	488 FPS	789 FPS
high	488 FPS	777 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	699 FPS
1440p
low	488 FPS	789 FPS
medium	488 FPS	716 FPS
high	488 FPS	623 FPS
ultra	473 FPS	547 FPS
4K
low	488 FPS	560 FPS
medium	450 FPS	510 FPS
high	391 FPS	457 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	402 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core Ultra 5 225F

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Core Ultra 5 225F

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Core Ultra 5 225F

The Core Ultra 5 225F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 31,541 points. Launch price was $231.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 225F offers 10 cores / 10 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225F — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 225F uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core Ultra 5 225F's 31,541 — a 47% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,380 vs 17,050 (31.7% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,700 vs 2,653, a 43.8% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 657 vs 13,028 (180.8% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225F). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225F.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Core Ultra 5 225F
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	10 / 10+67%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.9 GHz+11%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.3 GHz+32%
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+11%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	3 MB (per core)+140%
Process	Intel 7 nm	3 nm-57%
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
PassMark	19,532	31,541+61%
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,380	17,050+38%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,700	2,653+56%
Geekbench 6 Multi	657	13,028+1883%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 5 225F uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core Ultra 5 225F supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 24 (Core Ultra 5 225F) — the Core Ultra 5 225F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 225F).

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Core Ultra 5 225F
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1851
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	256 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	24+20%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 225F). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Core Ultra 5 225F
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming Performance/Value	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 5 225F debuted at $231. On MSRP ($174 vs $231), the Core i5-12400F is $57 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 136.5 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 225F — making the Core Ultra 5 225F the 19.5% better value option.