PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $380 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $554 MSRP).
✅Delivers 53.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $554 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i9-13900E.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (657 vs 15,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 36 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i9-13900E

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +33.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.1 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($554 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Core i9-13900E

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $380 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $554 MSRP).
✅Delivers 53.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $554 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i9-13900E.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +33.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (657 vs 15,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 36 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.1 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($554 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900E better than Core i5-12400F?

Yes. Core i9-13900E is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 33.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2183.1% better Geekbench multi-core, 107.2% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-13900E is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 33.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13900E is the better fit. You are getting 2183.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 24 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13900E is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-12400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i9-13900E is 218.4% more expensive on MSRP at $554 MSRP versus $174 MSRP, and it gives you a 33.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-12400F is also 53.6% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 73.1 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-13900E is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), 100% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 18 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 32 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-12400F Benchmark Check

Core i9-13900E Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core i9-13900E
1080p
low	183 FPS	305 FPS
medium	168 FPS	288 FPS
high	139 FPS	234 FPS
ultra	119 FPS	199 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	268 FPS
medium	132 FPS	229 FPS
high	106 FPS	174 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	154 FPS
4K
low	87 FPS	184 FPS
medium	81 FPS	157 FPS
high	64 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	106 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core i9-13900E

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core i9-13900E
1080p
low	471 FPS	412 FPS
medium	397 FPS	360 FPS
high	341 FPS	293 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	257 FPS
1440p
low	407 FPS	350 FPS
medium	351 FPS	314 FPS
high	309 FPS	261 FPS
ultra	265 FPS	210 FPS
4K
low	282 FPS	197 FPS
medium	248 FPS	179 FPS
high	229 FPS	170 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	146 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core i9-13900E

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core i9-13900E
1080p
low	488 FPS	1012 FPS
medium	488 FPS	1012 FPS
high	488 FPS	977 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	838 FPS
1440p
low	488 FPS	991 FPS
medium	488 FPS	881 FPS
high	485 FPS	793 FPS
ultra	434 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	442 FPS	599 FPS
medium	389 FPS	519 FPS
high	337 FPS	463 FPS
ultra	274 FPS	396 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core i9-13900E

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core i9-13900E
1080p
low	488 FPS	1012 FPS
medium	488 FPS	1012 FPS
high	488 FPS	935 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	810 FPS
1440p
low	488 FPS	1010 FPS
medium	488 FPS	881 FPS
high	488 FPS	761 FPS
ultra	473 FPS	651 FPS
4K
low	488 FPS	756 FPS
medium	450 FPS	662 FPS
high	391 FPS	578 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core i9-13900E

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Core i9-13900E

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Core i9-13900E

The Core i9-13900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 40,476 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i9-13900E offers 24 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13900E has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-13900E — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900E (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-13900E uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core i9-13900E's 40,476 — a 69.8% lead for the Core i9-13900E. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,700 vs 2,606, a 42.1% lead for the Core i9-13900E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 657 vs 15,000 (183.2% advantage for the Core i9-13900E). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900E.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Core i9-13900E
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	24 / 32+300%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	5.2 GHz+18%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+39%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)	36 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+60%
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	19,532	40,476+107%
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,380	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,700	2,606+53%
Geekbench 6 Multi	657	15,000+2183%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and W680,Q670,Z790,H770 (Core i9-13900E).

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Core i9-13900E
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900E). The Core i9-13900E includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Core i9-13900E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Core i9-13900E
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming Performance/Value	Embedded

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Core i9-13900E debuted at $554. On MSRP ($174 vs $554), the Core i5-12400F is $380 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Core i9-13900E — making the Core i5-12400F the 42.3% better value option.