
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Core i7-13800H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-13800H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13800H across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 26,349).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core i7-13800H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Core i7-13800H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.8% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Core i7-13800H
2023Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-13800H.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.8% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13800H across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 26,349).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core i7-13800H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13800H better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-13800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-13800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 521 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 533 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 468 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 234 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-13800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 648 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 467 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 491 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 370 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 338 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 289 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-13800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 659 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 659 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 659 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 659 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 659 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 551 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 393 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Core i7-13800H

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Core i7-13800H
Core i7-13800H
The Core i7-13800H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 26,349 points. Launch price was $457.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-13800H offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i7-13800H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13800H — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13800H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-13800H uses Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core i7-13800H's 26,349 — a 29.7% lead for the Core i7-13800H. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13800H.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-13800H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 14 / 20+133% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.2 GHz+18% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 26,349+35% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-13800H uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-13800H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA1744 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Core i7-13800H). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-13800H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












