
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Core i5-13450HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13450HX.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13450HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 24,869).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core i5-13450HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core i5-13450HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Core i5-13450HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13450HX.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13450HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 24,869).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core i5-13450HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13450HX better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-13450HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-13450HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 463 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 300 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 203 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-13450HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 375 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 490 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 331 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 246 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-13450HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 622 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 622 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 622 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 592 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 517 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Core i5-13450HX

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Core i5-13450HX
Core i5-13450HX
The Core i5-13450HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): + 20 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,869 points. Launch price was $326.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-13450HX offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13450HX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13450HX — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-13450HX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-13450HX uses Raptor Lake-HX (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core i5-13450HX's 24,869 — a 24% lead for the Core i5-13450HX. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13450HX.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-13450HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 16+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.6 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+4% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+11% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 24,869+27% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13450HX uses FCBGA1964 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-13450HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA1964 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Core i5-13450HX). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-13450HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












