
GeForce RTX 5090 D
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 5090 D
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,566 less on MSRP ($1,999 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 310.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.5 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 32 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (680 vs 752), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX PRO 6000
2025Why buy it
- ✅0.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅10.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (752 vs 680).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 32 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5090 D is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌328.5% HIGHER MSRP$8,565 MSRPvs$1,999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 20.5 G3D/$ ($8,565 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 5090 D
2025RTX PRO 6000
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,566 less on MSRP ($1,999 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 310.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.5 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅0.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅10.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (752 vs 680).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 32 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 32 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (680 vs 752), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5090 D is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌328.5% HIGHER MSRP$8,565 MSRPvs$1,999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 20.5 G3D/$ ($8,565 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 6000 better than GeForce RTX 5090 D?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 5090 D make more sense than RTX PRO 6000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5090 D | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 260 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 101 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5090 D | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 880 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 747 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 583 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 697 FPS | 726 FPS |
| medium | 591 FPS | 616 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 501 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 328 FPS | 337 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 311 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 268 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5090 D | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 944 FPS | 948 FPS |
| medium | 772 FPS | 775 FPS |
| high | 698 FPS | 701 FPS |
| ultra | 604 FPS | 606 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 731 FPS | 731 FPS |
| medium | 598 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 452 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 377 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 316 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5090 D | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 999 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 999 FPS | 999 FPS |
| high | 907 FPS | 930 FPS |
| ultra | 811 FPS | 827 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 895 FPS |
| medium | 778 FPS | 786 FPS |
| high | 685 FPS | 692 FPS |
| ultra | 592 FPS | 595 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 639 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 568 FPS | 574 FPS |
| high | 507 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 438 FPS | 440 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5090 D and RTX PRO 6000

GeForce RTX 5090 D
GeForce RTX 5090 D
The GeForce RTX 5090 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 41,059 points. Launch price was $2,299.

RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 6000
The RTX PRO 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42,899 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 5090 D scores 41,059 and the RTX PRO 6000 reaches 42,899 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5090 D is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RTX PRO 6000 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce RTX 5090 D) vs 24,064 (RTX PRO 6000). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5090 D) vs 115.8 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 6000). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 2407 MHz. Ray tracing: 170 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5090 D) vs 188 (RTX PRO 6000) with 680 Tensor cores vs 752.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 41,059 | 42,899+4% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760 | 24064+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS | 115.8 TFLOPS+10% |
| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz | 2407 MHz |
| ROPs | 176 | 176 |
| TMUs | 680 | 752+11% |
| L1 Cache | 21.3 MB | 23.5 MB+10% |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB | 128 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 170 | 188+11% |
| Tensor Cores | 680 | 752+11% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 5090 D is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 6000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 5090 D supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the RTX PRO 6000 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5090 D comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 6000 has 48 GB. The RTX PRO 6000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1792 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5090 D) vs 960 GB/s (RTX PRO 6000) — a 86.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5090 D. Bus width: 512-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce RTX 5090 D) vs 128 MB (RTX PRO 6000) — the RTX PRO 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB | 48 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1792 GB/s+87% | 960 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 512-bit+33% | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB | 128 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5090 D) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 9th Gen (GeForce RTX 5090 D) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 6000). Decoder: NVDEC 8th Gen vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5090 D) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX PRO 6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 9th Gen | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 8th Gen | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5090 D draws 575W versus the RTX PRO 6000's 600W — a 4.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 5090 D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1000W (GeForce RTX 5090 D) vs 500W (RTX PRO 6000). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 304mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W-4% | 600W |
| Recommended PSU | 1000W | 500W-50% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 304mm | 304mm |
| Height | 137mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 71.4 | 71.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5090 D launched at $1999 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 6000 launched at $8565. The GeForce RTX 5090 D costs 76.7% less ($6566 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.5 (GeForce RTX 5090 D) vs 5.0 (RTX PRO 6000) — the GeForce RTX 5090 D offers 310% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999-77% | $8565 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.5+310% | 5.0 |
| Codename | GB202 | GB202 |
| Release | January 30 2025 | 2025 |
| Ranking | #1 | #608 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











