G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB

2025

Why buy it

✅11.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (144 vs 232), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌63.6% higher power demand at 180W vs 110W.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅61.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (232 vs 144).
✅Draws 110W instead of 180W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 53.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $429 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB

2025

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅11.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).

Why buy it

✅61.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (232 vs 144).
✅Draws 110W instead of 180W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (144 vs 232), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌63.6% higher power demand at 180W vs 110W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 53.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $429 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB better than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile?

Yes. GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 11.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 2.7% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 16 GB vs 12 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2025 instead of 2023, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2023, more VRAM at 16 GB instead of 12 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 4 Super Resolution (2025) instead of DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and better frame-generation support with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025) instead of DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023). That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $429 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 11.2% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB Benchmark Check

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	221 FPS	163 FPS
medium	207 FPS	150 FPS
high	181 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	167 FPS	115 FPS
1440p
low	195 FPS	138 FPS
medium	165 FPS	115 FPS
high	137 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	130 FPS	87 FPS
4K
low	136 FPS	80 FPS
medium	115 FPS	68 FPS
high	93 FPS	52 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	46 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB Open RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	490 FPS	422 FPS
medium	403 FPS	365 FPS
high	318 FPS	295 FPS
ultra	269 FPS	259 FPS
1440p
low	318 FPS	326 FPS
medium	256 FPS	272 FPS
high	209 FPS	222 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	186 FPS
4K
low	160 FPS	179 FPS
medium	135 FPS	155 FPS
high	112 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	108 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB Open RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	890 FPS	870 FPS
medium	718 FPS	712 FPS
high	637 FPS	626 FPS
ultra	512 FPS	499 FPS
1440p
low	681 FPS	691 FPS
medium	541 FPS	561 FPS
high	469 FPS	483 FPS
ultra	384 FPS	374 FPS
4K
low	462 FPS	470 FPS
medium	365 FPS	383 FPS
high	318 FPS	328 FPS
ultra	256 FPS	249 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB Open RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	744 FPS	459 FPS
medium	610 FPS	408 FPS
high	533 FPS	344 FPS
ultra	479 FPS	302 FPS
1440p
low	601 FPS	381 FPS
medium	491 FPS	340 FPS
high	425 FPS	284 FPS
ultra	377 FPS	244 FPS
4K
low	363 FPS	242 FPS
medium	311 FPS	221 FPS
high	287 FPS	188 FPS
ultra	254 FPS	163 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB Open RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB

The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2407 MHz to 2572 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,770 points. Launch price was $429.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,167 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB scores 22,770 and the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile reaches 22,167 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,608 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 7,424 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 23.7 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 24.72 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 2572 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 58 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) with 144 Tensor cores vs 232.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
G3D Mark Score	22,770+3%	22,167
Architecture	Blackwell 2.0	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	5 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	4608	7424+61%
Compute (TFLOPS)	23.7 TFLOPS	24.72 TFLOPS+4%
Boost Clock	2572 MHz+54%	1665 MHz
ROPs	48	80+67%
TMUs	144	232+61%
L1 Cache	4.5 MB	7.3 MB+62%
L2 Cache	32 MB	48 MB+50%
Ray Tracing Cores	36	58+61%
Tensor Cores	144	232+61%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both cards support Frame Generation, but the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is on a newer tier with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile tops out at DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 4 Super Resolution	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14%	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 4)+14%	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 3.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
VRAM Capacity	16 GB+33%	12 GB
Memory Type	GDDR7	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s+4%	432 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	32 MB	48 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+300%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC (6th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile).

Feature	GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
Encoder	NVENC (9th Gen)	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC (6th Gen)	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB draws 180W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile's 110W — a 48.3% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 150W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 68°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
TDP	180W	110W-39%
Recommended PSU	650W	150W-77%
Power Connector	8-pin	Mobile
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	68°C-15%	80°C
Perf/Watt	126.5	201.5+59%