G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB

2025

Why buy it

✅12.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $570 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 129.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 23.1 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon PRO W7700

2023

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
132.9% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.1 vs 53.1 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB

2025

Radeon PRO W7700

2023

Why buy it

✅12.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $570 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 129.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 23.1 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
132.9% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.1 vs 53.1 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB better than Radeon PRO W7700?

Yes. GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 12.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 1.3% higher PassMark G3D performance, and DLSS 4 + Multi Frame Gen. It also comes from 2025 instead of 2023, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2023 and better frame-generation support with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025) instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is about $570 cheaper on MSRP at $429 MSRP versus $999 MSRP, and you are getting 12.7% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (22,770 vs 23,062). It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 129.9%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon PRO W7700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon PRO W7700 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $999 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W7700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB	Radeon PRO W7700
1080p
low	221 FPS	223 FPS
medium	207 FPS	205 FPS
high	181 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	167 FPS	163 FPS
1440p
low	195 FPS	201 FPS
medium	165 FPS	167 FPS
high	137 FPS	139 FPS
ultra	130 FPS	130 FPS
4K
low	136 FPS	136 FPS
medium	115 FPS	114 FPS
high	93 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	84 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB Open Radeon PRO W7700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB	Radeon PRO W7700
1080p
low	490 FPS	561 FPS
medium	403 FPS	462 FPS
high	318 FPS	360 FPS
ultra	269 FPS	302 FPS
1440p
low	318 FPS	369 FPS
medium	256 FPS	305 FPS
high	209 FPS	248 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	210 FPS
4K
low	160 FPS	168 FPS
medium	135 FPS	138 FPS
high	112 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	91 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB Open Radeon PRO W7700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB	Radeon PRO W7700
1080p
low	890 FPS	911 FPS
medium	718 FPS	741 FPS
high	637 FPS	644 FPS
ultra	512 FPS	519 FPS
1440p
low	681 FPS	704 FPS
medium	541 FPS	567 FPS
high	469 FPS	481 FPS
ultra	384 FPS	389 FPS
4K
low	462 FPS	492 FPS
medium	365 FPS	395 FPS
high	318 FPS	329 FPS
ultra	256 FPS	259 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB Open Radeon PRO W7700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB	Radeon PRO W7700
1080p
low	744 FPS	785 FPS
medium	610 FPS	653 FPS
high	533 FPS	591 FPS
ultra	479 FPS	506 FPS
1440p
low	601 FPS	622 FPS
medium	491 FPS	517 FPS
high	425 FPS	463 FPS
ultra	377 FPS	389 FPS
4K
low	363 FPS	399 FPS
medium	311 FPS	346 FPS
high	287 FPS	318 FPS
ultra	254 FPS	259 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB Open Radeon PRO W7700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB and Radeon PRO W7700

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB

The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2407 MHz to 2572 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,770 points. Launch price was $429.

Radeon PRO W7700

The Radeon PRO W7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,062 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB scores 22,770 and the Radeon PRO W7700 reaches 23,062 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon PRO W7700 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,608 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 3,072 (Radeon PRO W7700). Raw compute: 23.7 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 31.95 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7700). Boost clocks: 2572 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 48 (Radeon PRO W7700) with 144 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB	Radeon PRO W7700
G3D Mark Score	22,770	23,062+1%
Architecture	Blackwell 2.0	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	5 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	4608+50%	3072
Compute (TFLOPS)	23.7 TFLOPS	31.95 TFLOPS+35%
Boost Clock	2572 MHz	2600 MHz+1%
ROPs	48	96+100%
TMUs	144	192+33%
L1 Cache	4.5 MB+500%	0.75 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+1500%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	36	48+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB	Radeon PRO W7700
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 4 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 4)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 16 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7700) — a 3.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7700) — the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB	Radeon PRO W7700
VRAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
Memory Type	GDDR7	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s+4%	432 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	32 MB+1500%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7700). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB	Radeon PRO W7700
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7700). Decoder: NVDEC (6th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7700).

Feature	GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB	Radeon PRO W7700
Encoder	NVENC (9th Gen)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC (6th Gen)	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB draws 180W versus the Radeon PRO W7700's 190W — a 5.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 550W (Radeon PRO W7700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 68°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB	Radeon PRO W7700
TDP	180W-5%	190W
Recommended PSU	650W	550W-15%
Power Connector	8-pin	1x 8-pin
Length	—	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	68°C-15%	80°C
Perf/Watt	126.5+4%	121.4

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB launched at $429 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7700 launched at $999. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB costs 57.1% less ($570 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 53.1 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 23.1 (Radeon PRO W7700) — the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB offers 129.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).