
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 220W instead of 285W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 285mm, a 43mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅18.3% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌60.1% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.5 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌29.5% higher power demand at 285W vs 220W.
- ❌17.8% longer card at 285mm vs 242mm.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 220W instead of 285W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 285mm, a 43mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅18.3% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌60.1% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.5 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌29.5% higher power demand at 285W vs 220W.
- ❌17.8% longer card at 285mm vs 242mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than GeForce RTX 3070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3070 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 664 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 366 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 269 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 159 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 742 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 879 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 731 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 600 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 706 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 324 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 42.4%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 60 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) with 184 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172 | 31,578+42% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 7680+30% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+97% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2610 MHz+51% |
| ROPs | 96+20% | 80 |
| TMUs | 184 | 240+30% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 7.5 MB+29% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 60+30% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 240+30% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3070 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 12.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 504 GB/s+13% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 25.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-23% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-7% | 700W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 285mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 110.8+10% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 37.5% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 12.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-38% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+12% | 39.5 |
| Codename | GA104 | AD104 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #63 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












