
GeForce GTX 1080
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1080
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 285W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 310mm, a 43mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.1 vs 39.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅87.1% more average FPS across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 52.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.8 vs 26.1 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌58.3% higher power demand at 285W vs 180W.
- ❌16.1% longer card at 310mm vs 267mm.
GeForce GTX 1080
2016GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 285W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 310mm, a 43mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅87.1% more average FPS across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 52.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.8 vs 26.1 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.1 vs 39.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌58.3% higher power demand at 285W vs 180W.
- ❌16.1% longer card at 310mm vs 267mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER better than GeForce GTX 1080?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1080 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 289 FPS | 719 FPS |
| medium | 242 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 163 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 702 FPS | 933 FPS |
| medium | 562 FPS | 752 FPS |
| high | 468 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 527 FPS | 722 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 581 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 501 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 500 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 407 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 299 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 399 FPS | 962 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 817 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 726 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 651 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 753 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 630 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 548 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 483 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 341 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1080 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

GeForce GTX 1080
GeForce GTX 1080
The GeForce GTX 1080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,609 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2340 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 8448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 66 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,828 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1080 scores 15,609 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 31,828 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER leads by 103.9%. The GeForce GTX 1080 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses Ada Lovelace, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 8,448 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 44.1 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2610 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,609 | 31,828+104% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 8448+230% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 44.1 TFLOPS+397% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2610 MHz+51% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 264+65% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 8.3 MB+783% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1080 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1080 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1080 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — a 110% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 672 GB/s+110% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1080) vs NVENC 8th gen (Dual) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | NVENC 8th gen (Dual) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1080 draws 180W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 285W — a 45.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1080 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 267mm vs 310mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 72°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-37% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-33% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 267mm | 310mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 72°C-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 86.7 | 111.7+29% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1080 launched at $599 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER launched at $799. The GeForce GTX 1080 costs 25% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.1 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 39.8 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers 52.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-25% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.1 | 39.8+52% |
| Codename | GP104 | AD103 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | January 8 2024 |
| Ranking | #137 | #10 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













