
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
Popular choices:

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
2022Why buy it
- ✅4.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
2022RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅4.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile better than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU make more sense than GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 28 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 379 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 230 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 232 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 72 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 833 FPS | 826 FPS |
| medium | 672 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 590 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 645 FPS | 628 FPS |
| medium | 516 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 430 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 332 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 406 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 212 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 79 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 25 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 810 MHz to 1260 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,115 points.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,656 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile scores 19,115 and the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU reaches 19,656 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is built on Ampere while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,424 (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile) vs 5,120 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 18.71 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile) vs 15.82 TFLOPS (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1260 MHz vs 1545 MHz. Ray tracing: 58 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile) vs 40 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) with 232 Tensor cores vs 160.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,115 | 19,656+3% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7424+45% | 5120 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 18.71 TFLOPS+18% | 15.82 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1260 MHz | 1545 MHz+23% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 232+45% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 7.3 MB+46% | 5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 58+45% | 40 |
| Tensor Cores | 232+45% | 160 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — a 18.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile) vs 48 MB (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+19% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile) vs NVENC 8th gen (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile draws 150W versus the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 100W — a 40% difference. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile) vs 150W (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 100W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 150W-77% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 127.4 | 196.6+54% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












