
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
2022Why buy it
- ✅26.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (232 vs 184).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅12.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 232), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
2022GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅26.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (232 vs 184).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅12.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 232), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 58 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 351 FPS |
| medium | 232 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 101 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 833 FPS | 884 FPS |
| medium | 672 FPS | 713 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 645 FPS | 684 FPS |
| medium | 516 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 430 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 277 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 751 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 500 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 395 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 272 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile and GeForce RTX 4070

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 25 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 810 MHz to 1260 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,115 points.

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile scores 19,115 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 40.8%. The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,424 (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 18.71 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1260 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 58 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 4070) with 232 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,115 | 26,919+41% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7424+26% | 5888 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 18.71 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+56% |
| Boost Clock | 1260 MHz | 2475 MHz+96% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 232+26% | 184 |
| L1 Cache | 7.3 MB+26% | 5.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 36 MB+800% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 58+26% | 46 |
| Tensor Cores | 232+26% | 184 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 1.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+2% | 504 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 36 MB+800% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 304mm, occupying 0 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-25% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 304mm |
| Height | 0mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 127.4 | 134.6+6% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $599 |
| Codename | GA103S | AD104 |
| Release | January 25 2022 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #88 | #32 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












