
GeForce GTX 1080
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1080
2016Why buy it
- ✅+18.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅3.1% more average FPS across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,170 vs 15,609).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1080
2016GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅+18.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅3.1% more average FPS across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,170 vs 15,609).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU better than GeForce GTX 1080?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1080 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 26 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 289 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 242 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 702 FPS | 593 FPS |
| medium | 562 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 468 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 296 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 527 FPS | 444 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 296 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 148 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 399 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 296 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 444 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 296 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 148 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1080 and GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

GeForce GTX 1080
GeForce GTX 1080
The GeForce GTX 1080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,609 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,170 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1080 scores 15,609 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU's 13,170 — the GeForce GTX 1080 leads by 18.5%. The GeForce GTX 1080 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,609+19% | 13,170 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3584+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS+44% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 1777 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 160+43% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 3.5 MB+272% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1080 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1080 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1080 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) — a 5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 336 GB/s+5% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1080) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1080 draws 180W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU's 170W — a 5.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 170W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 86.7+12% | 77.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | GA106 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | October 12 2022 |
| Ranking | #137 | #147 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













