
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB
Popular choices:

RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB
2022Why buy it
- ✅27.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $296 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $625 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 85.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.0 vs 27.4 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $625 MSRP).
- ✅218.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 88).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 2000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 350W vs 70W.
- ❌44.9% longer card at 242mm vs 167mm.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
2024Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 350W, a 280W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 242mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 12GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (88 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌90% HIGHER MSRP$625 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.4 vs 51.0 G3D/$ ($625 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB
2022RTX 2000 Ada Generation
2024Why buy it
- ✅27.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $296 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $625 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 85.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.0 vs 27.4 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $625 MSRP).
- ✅218.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 88).
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 350W, a 280W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 242mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 2000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 350W vs 70W.
- ❌44.9% longer card at 242mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 12GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (88 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌90% HIGHER MSRP$625 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.4 vs 51.0 G3D/$ ($625 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 2000 Ada Generation better than GeForce RTX 3060 12GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3060 12GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 68 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 494 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 59 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 755 FPS | 733 FPS |
| medium | 604 FPS | 591 FPS |
| high | 503 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 377 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 566 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 453 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 377 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 283 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 377 FPS | 335 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 252 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 164 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 445 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 542 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 456 FPS |
| ultra | 288 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 366 FPS | 520 FPS |
| medium | 328 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 271 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 289 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 283 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 193 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 12GB and RTX 2000 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 3060 12GB
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB
The GeForce RTX 3060 12GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1260 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,777 points. Launch price was $799.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,147 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3060 12GB scores 16,777 and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation reaches 17,147 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3060 12GB is built on Ampere while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 8,960 (GeForce RTX 3060 12GB) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 30.64 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 12GB) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 2130 MHz. Ray tracing: 70 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 12GB) vs 22 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) with 280 Tensor cores vs 88.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,777 | 17,147+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 8960+218% | 2816 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 30.64 TFLOPS+155% | 12 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz | 2130 MHz+25% |
| ROPs | 96+100% | 48 |
| TMUs | 280+218% | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 8.8 MB+214% | 2.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 12 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 70+218% | 22 |
| Tensor Cores | 280+218% | 88 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 12GB comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation has 16 GB. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 12GB) vs 256 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) — a 40.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 12GB. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 12GB) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 360 GB/s+41% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 12 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060 12GB) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3060 12GB) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 12GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 12GB draws 350W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 133.3% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060 12GB) vs 650W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 350W | 70W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 167mm |
| Height | 112mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 47.9 | 245.0+411% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 12GB launched at $329 MSRP, while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation launched at $625. The GeForce RTX 3060 12GB costs 47.4% less ($296 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.0 (GeForce RTX 3060 12GB) vs 27.4 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 3060 12GB offers 86.1% better value. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-47% | $625 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.0+86% | 27.4 |
| Codename | GA102 | AD107 |
| Release | January 11 2022 | February 12 2024 |
| Ranking | #38 | #107 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












