
GeForce GTX TITAN X
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX TITAN X
2015Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌301.2% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 50.3 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 298.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.3 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
GeForce GTX TITAN X
2015GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 298.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.3 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌301.2% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 50.3 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX TITAN X better than GeForce RTX 3050 8GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 8GB make more sense than GeForce GTX TITAN X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 252 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 47 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 568 FPS | 564 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 451 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 282 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 423 FPS |
| medium | 341 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 141 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 282 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 391 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 131 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN X and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB

GeForce GTX TITAN X
GeForce GTX TITAN X
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,621 points. Launch price was $999.

GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN X scores 12,621 and the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB reaches 12,535 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN X is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Raw compute: 6.691 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,621 | 12,535 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+20% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.691 TFLOPS | 9.098 TFLOPS+36% |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 1777 MHz+65% |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 192+140% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB | 2.5 MB+127% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX TITAN X is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN X comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has 8 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN X offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN X. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce GTX TITAN X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+50% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd gen | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN X draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 130W — a 63.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 66°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 130W-48% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 450W-25% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 83°C | 66°C-20% |
| Perf/Watt | 50.5 | 96.4+91% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX TITAN X launched at $999 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB costs 75.1% less ($750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.6 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 50.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 299.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $249-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.6 | 50.3+299% |
| Codename | GM200 | GA106 |
| Release | March 17 2015 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #209 | #211 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













