
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Quadro P4200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
2024Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 100W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P4200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,200 MSRP).
Quadro P4200
2018Why buy it
- ✅19.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 100W vs 70W.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
2024Quadro P4200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 100W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅19.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P4200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,200 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 100W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P4200 better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU make more sense than Quadro P4200?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | Quadro P4200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 24 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | Quadro P4200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | Quadro P4200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 374 FPS |
| high | 304 FPS | 311 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 233 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 342 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 228 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 117 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | Quadro P4200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU and Quadro P4200

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,143 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200
The Quadro P4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,376 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU scores 10,143 and the Quadro P4200 reaches 10,376 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU is built on Ampere while the Quadro P4200 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU) vs 2,304 (Quadro P4200). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU) vs 7.589 TFLOPS (Quadro P4200). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1647 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | Quadro P4200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,143 | 10,376+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 7.589 TFLOPS+12% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1647 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 144+100% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+174% | 0.84 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P4200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | Quadro P4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P4200 has 8 GB. The Quadro P4200 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | Quadro P4200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU) vs 12 (Quadro P4200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | Quadro P4200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P4200). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU) vs H.265,H.264,VP9 (Quadro P4200).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | Quadro P4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 3rd Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU draws 70W versus the Quadro P4200's 100W — a 35.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU) vs 500W (Quadro P4200). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 105mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | Quadro P4200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-30% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 105mm |
| Height | 0mm | 82mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 144.9+40% | 103.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | Quadro P4200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $1200 |
| Codename | GA107 | GP104 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #252 | #266 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











