
GeForce RTX 2070
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2070
2018Why buy it
- ✅56.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (288 vs 184).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅50.4% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 67.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 288), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
GeForce RTX 2070
2018GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅56.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (288 vs 184).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅50.4% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 67.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 288), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than GeForce RTX 2070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2070 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 58 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 351 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 101 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 723 FPS | 884 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 713 FPS |
| high | 482 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 542 FPS | 684 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 362 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 271 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 362 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 289 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 277 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 751 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 297 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 361 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 500 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 395 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 272 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2070 and GeForce RTX 4070

GeForce RTX 2070
GeForce RTX 2070
The GeForce RTX 2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 17 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,068 points. Launch price was $499.

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2070 scores 16,068 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 67.5%. The GeForce RTX 2070 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 7.465 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1620 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 4070) with 288 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,068 | 26,919+68% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 5888+156% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.465 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+290% |
| Boost Clock | 1620 MHz | 2475 MHz+53% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 184+28% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 5.8 MB+152% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 36 MB+800% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 46+28% |
| Tensor Cores | 288+57% | 184 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2070 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 2070 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 12.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 504 GB/s+13% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 36 MB+800% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP9 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2070 draws 175W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 13.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W-13% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 304mm |
| Height | 112mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.8 | 134.6+47% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.8 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 67.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.8 | 44.9+68% |
| Codename | TU106 | AD104 |
| Release | October 17 2018 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #129 | #32 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













