
GeForce GTX 1660
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1660
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $380 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 18.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 200W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 304mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅113.8% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌173.5% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 44.9 vs 53.1 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 120W.
- ❌32.8% longer card at 304mm vs 229mm.
GeForce GTX 1660
2019GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $380 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 18.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 200W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 304mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅113.8% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌173.5% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 44.9 vs 53.1 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 120W.
- ❌32.8% longer card at 304mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than GeForce GTX 1660?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1660 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 58 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 351 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 101 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 884 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 713 FPS |
| high | 346 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 684 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 277 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 364 FPS | 751 FPS |
| medium | 301 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 251 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 296 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 500 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 395 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 272 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 and GeForce RTX 4070

GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660
The GeForce GTX 1660 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 14 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,639 points. Launch price was $219.

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1660 scores 11,639 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 131.3%. The GeForce GTX 1660 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 2475 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,639 | 26,919+131% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 5888+318% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+480% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 2475 MHz+39% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 88 | 184+109% |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB | 5.8 MB+314% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 36 MB+2300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1660 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1660 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1660 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 162.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 12 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 504 GB/s+163% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 36 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 draws 120W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-40% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-31% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 97.0 | 134.6+39% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1660 launched at $219 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. The GeForce GTX 1660 costs 63.4% less ($380 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 53.1 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce GTX 1660 offers 18.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $219-63% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.1+18% | 44.9 |
| Codename | TU116 | AD104 |
| Release | March 14 2019 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #231 | #32 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













