
GeForce GTX 1660
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1660
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 53.1 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅51.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 23% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 53.1 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 1660
2019GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅51.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 23% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 53.1 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 53.1 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than GeForce GTX 1660?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1660 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 55 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 211 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 63 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 812 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 346 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 186 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 364 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 301 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 251 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 296 FPS | 594 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 330 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 358 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 220 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 and GeForce RTX 4060

GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660
The GeForce GTX 1660 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 14 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,639 points. Launch price was $219.

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1660 scores 11,639 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 68%. The GeForce GTX 1660 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 2460 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,639 | 19,548+68% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 3072+118% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS+201% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 2460 MHz+38% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 88 | 96+9% |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB | 3 MB+114% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 24 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1660 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1660 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1660 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) — a 41.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 272 GB/s+42% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 24 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1660) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 draws 120W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 4.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 73°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W | 115W-4% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-18% | 550W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 73°C-3% |
| Perf/Watt | 97.0 | 170.0+75% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1660 launched at $219 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299. The GeForce GTX 1660 costs 26.8% less ($80 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 53.1 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 23.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $219-27% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.1 | 65.4+23% |
| Codename | TU116 | AD107 |
| Release | March 14 2019 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #231 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













