GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs RADEON E2400

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

RADEON E2400

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

59

G3D Mark Score

52

Performance Difference

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is 13.5% faster than RADEON E2400

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra256 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

0 GB VRAM Β· 59 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

RADEON E2400N/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, GeForce FX 5950 Ultra performs 13.5% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between GeForce FX 5950 Ultra and RADEON E2400.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for GeForce FX 5950 Ultra and RADEON E2400

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. Core clock: 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 59 points. Launch price was $149.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:24
TMUs:32
Vram:256 MB
L1 Cache:256 kB
L2 Cache:384 kB
Core Clock:900 MHz
Shading Units:192
Max Temperature:100 Β°C
Transistor Count:1,170 million
Texture Fill Rate:28.80
Manufacturing Process:40 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):116 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.6912 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GF116
Architecture:Fermi 2.0 (2010βˆ’2014)
Launch Price:$149
Release Date:March 15 2011
Performance Ranking Position:761
AMD

RADEON E2400

The RADEON E2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $79.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:24
Vram:null
L1 Cache:96 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:1183 MHz
Boost Clock:1124 MHz
Shading Units:384
Transistor Count:2,200 million
Texture Fill Rate:28.39
Manufacturing Process:14 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):50 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.9085 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Lexa
Architecture:GCN 4.0 (2016βˆ’2020)
Launch Price:$79
Release Date:April 20 2017
Performance Ranking Position:773

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce FX 5950 Ultra and RADEON E2400