FirePro W8100 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

FirePro W8100

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
Intel

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

6812

G3D Mark Score

1538

Performance Difference

FirePro W8100 is 342.9% faster than Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

FirePro W81008192 MB
016GB32GB
1080pMedium
41%
low86%
medium68%
high38%
ultra18%
1440pLow
24%
low68%
medium38%
high18%
ultra11%
4KLimited
13%
low38%
medium18%
high11%
ultra5%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

8 GB VRAM Β· 6,812 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pMedium settings. Stable 60 FPS in most games.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Balanced mode: +40-50% FPS. Helps at 1440p/4K.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200N/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, FirePro W8100 performs 342.9% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between FirePro W8100 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for FirePro W8100 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

FirePro W8100

The FirePro W8100 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in June 23 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. Core clock: 824 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,812 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:64
TMUs:160
Vram:8192 MB
L1 Cache:640 kB
L2 Cache:1024 kB
Core Clock:824 MHz
Shading Units:2560
Transistor Count:6,200 million
Texture Fill Rate:131.8
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):220 Watt
Floating Point Performance:4.219 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Hawaii
Architecture:GCN 2.0 (2013βˆ’2017)
Release Date:June 23 2014
Performance Ranking Position:361
Intel

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,538 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:6
TMUs:48
Vram:null
Core Clock:300 MHz
Boost Clock:1100 MHz
Shading Units:384
Transistor Count:189 million
Texture Fill Rate:52.80
Manufacturing Process:14 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):15 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.8448 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Broadwell GT3e
Architecture:Generation 8.0 (2014βˆ’2015)
Release Date:September 5 2014
Performance Ranking Position:763

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W8100 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200