
FX-6350
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
FX-6350
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $167 less on MSRP ($132 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,640 vs 21,845).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.2 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($132 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +117.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 107.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 35.2 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $132 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌126.5% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$132 MSRP
FX-6350
2013Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $167 less on MSRP ($132 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +117.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 107.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 35.2 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $132 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,640 vs 21,845).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.2 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($132 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌126.5% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$132 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than FX-6350?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FX-6350 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FX-6350 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 291 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FX-6350 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 199 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FX-6350 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 524 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FX-6350 and Ryzen 5 5600X

FX-6350
FX-6350
The FX-6350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,640 points. Launch price was $69.


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The FX-6350 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, matching the Ryzen 5 5600X's 6 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the FX-6350 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 9.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.9 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The FX-6350 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the FX-6350 scores 4,640 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 129.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | FX-6350 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.6 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz+5% | 3.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6144 kB+1100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Vishera (2012−2015) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 4,640 | 21,845+371% |
Memory & Platform
The FX-6350 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-6350 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (FX-6350) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | FX-6350 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The FX-6350 launched at $132 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($132 vs $299), the FX-6350 is $167 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-6350 delivers 35.2 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 70.1% better value option.
| Feature | FX-6350 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $132-56% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.2 | 73.1+108% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












