G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro S9050

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 225W instead of 285W, a 60W reduction.
✅Measures 254mm instead of 285mm, a 31mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,901 vs 31,578).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
150.2% HIGHER MSRP
$1,999 MSRPvs$799 MSRP

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+544.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,200 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1512% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌26.7% higher power demand at 285W vs 225W.
❌12.2% longer card at 285mm vs 254mm.

FirePro S9050

2014

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 225W instead of 285W, a 60W reduction.
✅Measures 254mm instead of 285mm, a 31mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅+544.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,200 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1512% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,901 vs 31,578).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
150.2% HIGHER MSRP
$1,999 MSRPvs$799 MSRP

Trade-offs

❌26.7% higher power demand at 285W vs 225W.
❌12.2% longer card at 285mm vs 254mm.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than FirePro S9050?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 31,578 vs 4,901 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while FirePro S9050 is a 2014 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2014, 544.3% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is about $1,200 cheaper on MSRP at $799 MSRP versus $1,999 MSRP, and you are getting 544.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 1512%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is FirePro S9050 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. FirePro S9050 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $1,999 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro S9050 Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	FirePro S9050	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
1080p
low	104 FPS	188 FPS
medium	89 FPS	171 FPS
high	73 FPS	155 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	135 FPS
1440p
low	91 FPS	151 FPS
medium	80 FPS	125 FPS
high	58 FPS	111 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	102 FPS
4K
low	29 FPS	92 FPS
medium	27 FPS	79 FPS
high	18 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	16 FPS	59 FPS

Open FirePro S9050 Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	FirePro S9050	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
1080p
low	140 FPS	664 FPS
medium	108 FPS	539 FPS
high	86 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	366 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	496 FPS
medium	56 FPS	400 FPS
high	42 FPS	329 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	269 FPS
4K
low	29 FPS	250 FPS
medium	20 FPS	211 FPS
high	16 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	12 FPS	159 FPS

Open FirePro S9050 Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	FirePro S9050	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
1080p
low	221 FPS	921 FPS
medium	176 FPS	742 FPS
high	147 FPS	652 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	569 FPS
1440p
low	165 FPS	720 FPS
medium	132 FPS	578 FPS
high	110 FPS	497 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	427 FPS
4K
low	110 FPS	498 FPS
medium	88 FPS	403 FPS
high	74 FPS	352 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	296 FPS

Open FirePro S9050 Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	FirePro S9050	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
1080p
low	183 FPS	879 FPS
medium	148 FPS	731 FPS
high	130 FPS	664 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	600 FPS
1440p
low	129 FPS	706 FPS
medium	107 FPS	585 FPS
high	94 FPS	514 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	460 FPS
4K
low	76 FPS	477 FPS
medium	58 FPS	408 FPS
high	47 FPS	366 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	324 FPS

Open FirePro S9050 Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S9050 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

FirePro S9050

The FirePro S9050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,901 points.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro S9050 scores 4,901 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 544.3%. The FirePro S9050 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9050) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9050) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).

Feature	FirePro S9050	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
G3D Mark Score	4,901	31,578+544%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	28 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	1792	7680+329%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.226 TFLOPS	40.09 TFLOPS+1143%
ROPs	32	80+150%
TMUs	112	240+114%
L1 Cache	0.44 MB	7.5 MB+1605%
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	48 MB+6300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The FirePro S9050 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro S9050 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	FirePro S9050	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro S9050 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S9050) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro S9050	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	12 GB+200%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Bus Width	64-bit	192-bit+200%
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	48 MB+6300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S9050) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

Feature	FirePro S9050	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
DirectX	12	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	1	4+300%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9050) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro S9050) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).

Feature	FirePro S9050	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Encoder	VCE 1.0	NVENC (8th Gen)
Decoder	UVD 3.2	NVDEC (5th Gen)
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S9050 draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 23.5% difference. The FirePro S9050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9050) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 254mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 70°C.

Feature	FirePro S9050	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
TDP	225W-21%	285W
Recommended PSU	350W-50%	700W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	8-pin
Length	254mm	285mm
Height	111mm	112mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	90°C	70°C-22%
Perf/Watt	21.8	110.8+408%

💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro S9050 launched at $1999 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 60% less ($1200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro S9050) vs 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 1480% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).