
FirePro S9050
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro S9050
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,901 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌401% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+314.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1976.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
FirePro S9050
2014GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅+314.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1976.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,901 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌401% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than FirePro S9050?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is FirePro S9050 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 248 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 73 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 859 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 602 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 457 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 658 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 221 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 580 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 478 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 427 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 290 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 195 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S9050 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

FirePro S9050
FirePro S9050
The FirePro S9050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,901 points.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro S9050 scores 4,901 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 314.4%. The FirePro S9050 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9050) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9050) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,901 | 20,312+314% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 4864+171% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS | 16.2 TFLOPS+402% |
| ROPs | 32 | 80+150% |
| TMUs | 112 | 152+36% |
| L1 Cache | 0.44 MB | 4.8 MB+991% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 4 MB+433% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro S9050 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro S9050 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S9050) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 4 MB+433% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S9050) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9050) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro S9050) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC (Ampere) |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | NVDEC (Ampere) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S9050 draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9050) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 254mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 75.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 200W-11% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 254mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 75-17% |
| Perf/Watt | 21.8 | 101.6+366% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro S9050 launched at $1999 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 80% less ($1600 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro S9050) vs 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 1936% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $399-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | 50.9+1936% |
| Codename | Tahiti | GA104 |
| Release | August 7 2014 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #446 | #73 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












