G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro S9050

2014

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,901 vs 7,869).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
1241.6% HIGHER MSRP
$1,999 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅+60.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,850 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2054.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than FirePro S9050: it remains the more sensible modern option while FirePro S9050 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

FirePro S9050

2014

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Why buy it

✅+60.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,850 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2054.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than FirePro S9050: it remains the more sensible modern option while FirePro S9050 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,901 vs 7,869).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
1241.6% HIGHER MSRP
$1,999 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than FirePro S9050?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 7,869 vs 4,901 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while FirePro S9050 is a 2014 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2014, 60.6% more raw performance headroom, and a 12nm process instead of 28nm. That extra performance headroom should help it hold higher settings and newer game demands for longer.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1650 is about $1,850 cheaper on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $1,999 MSRP, and you are getting 60.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 2054.1%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is FirePro S9050 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. FirePro S9050 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $1,999 MSRP, even if GeForce GTX 1650 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro S9050 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	FirePro S9050	GeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low	104 FPS	94 FPS
medium	89 FPS	83 FPS
high	73 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	58 FPS
1440p
low	91 FPS	87 FPS
medium	80 FPS	74 FPS
high	58 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	50 FPS
4K
low	29 FPS	41 FPS
medium	27 FPS	39 FPS
high	18 FPS	27 FPS
ultra	16 FPS	24 FPS

Open FirePro S9050 Open GeForce GTX 1650

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	FirePro S9050	GeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low	140 FPS	136 FPS
medium	108 FPS	113 FPS
high	86 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	71 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	79 FPS
medium	56 FPS	62 FPS
high	42 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	35 FPS
4K
low	29 FPS	36 FPS
medium	20 FPS	27 FPS
high	16 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	12 FPS	15 FPS

Open FirePro S9050 Open GeForce GTX 1650

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	FirePro S9050	GeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low	221 FPS	323 FPS
medium	176 FPS	283 FPS
high	147 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	169 FPS
1440p
low	165 FPS	225 FPS
medium	132 FPS	202 FPS
high	110 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	117 FPS
4K
low	110 FPS	130 FPS
medium	88 FPS	117 FPS
high	74 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	50 FPS

Open FirePro S9050 Open GeForce GTX 1650

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	FirePro S9050	GeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low	183 FPS	261 FPS
medium	148 FPS	211 FPS
high	130 FPS	191 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	166 FPS
1440p
low	129 FPS	201 FPS
medium	107 FPS	158 FPS
high	94 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	113 FPS
4K
low	76 FPS	99 FPS
medium	58 FPS	74 FPS
high	47 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	51 FPS

Open FirePro S9050 Open GeForce GTX 1650

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S9050 and GeForce GTX 1650

FirePro S9050

The FirePro S9050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,901 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro S9050 scores 4,901 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 60.6%. The FirePro S9050 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9050) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9050) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	FirePro S9050	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	4,901	7,869+61%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1792+100%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.226 TFLOPS+8%	2.984 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	112+100%	56
L1 Cache	448 KB	896 KB+100%
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	1 MB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro S9050 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	FirePro S9050	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S9050) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro S9050	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	1 MB+33%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S9050) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.

Feature	FirePro S9050	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12	12
Vulkan	1.2	1.4+17%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	1	3+200%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9050) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro S9050) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	FirePro S9050	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	VCE 1.0	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	UVD 3.2	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S9050 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9050) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 254mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 70°C.

Feature	FirePro S9050	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	225W	75W-67%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	254mm	229mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	90°C	70°C-22%
Perf/Watt	21.8	104.9+381%

💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro S9050 launched at $1999 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 92.5% less ($1850 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro S9050) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 2012% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).