
FirePro S9050
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro S9050
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,901 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌300.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+352.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,500 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1712.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
FirePro S9050
2014GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅+352.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,500 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1712.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,901 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌300.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than FirePro S9050?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is FirePro S9050 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 885 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 619 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 499 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 473 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 249 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 200 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S9050 and GeForce RTX 3070

FirePro S9050
FirePro S9050
The FirePro S9050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,901 points.

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro S9050 scores 4,901 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 352.4%. The FirePro S9050 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9050) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9050) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,901 | 22,172+352% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 5888+229% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+530% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 112 | 184+64% |
| L1 Cache | 0.44 MB | 5.8 MB+1218% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 4 MB+433% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro S9050 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro S9050 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S9050) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 4 MB+433% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S9050) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9050) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro S9050) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S9050 draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 2.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9050) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 254mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 220W-2% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 254mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 75°C-17% |
| Perf/Watt | 21.8 | 100.8+362% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro S9050 launched at $1999 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 75% less ($1500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro S9050) vs 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 1676% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $499-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | 44.4+1676% |
| Codename | Tahiti | GA104 |
| Release | August 7 2014 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #446 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












