PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9754

2023

Why buy it

✅+583.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 128 cores / 256 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($11,900 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌242.9% higher power demand at 360W vs 105W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 5 7600X

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +41.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $11,601 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1045.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 360W, a 255W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9754 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,300 vs 104,584).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9754, which brings 128 cores / 256 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 9754

2023

Ryzen 5 7600X

2022

Why buy it

✅+583.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 128 cores / 256 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +41.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $11,601 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1045.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 360W, a 255W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9754 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($11,900 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌242.9% higher power demand at 360W vs 105W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,300 vs 104,584).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9754, which brings 128 cores / 256 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9754 better than Ryzen 5 7600X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 9754 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 7600X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9754 is the better fit. You are getting 583.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 128 cores and 256 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9754 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 7600X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 9754 is 3879.9% more expensive on MSRP at $11,900 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it gives you 583.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The trade-off is that Ryzen 5 7600X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 41.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 7600X is also 1045.1% better value on MSRP (94.7 vs 8.3 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9754 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), 700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 128 cores / 256 threads instead of 6/12. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9754 Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 7600X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9754	Ryzen 5 7600X
1080p
low	163 FPS	266 FPS
medium	134 FPS	246 FPS
high	113 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	179 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	226 FPS
medium	114 FPS	189 FPS
high	90 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	68 FPS	157 FPS
medium	58 FPS	131 FPS
high	45 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	87 FPS

Open EPYC 9754 Open Ryzen 5 7600X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9754	Ryzen 5 7600X
1080p
low	238 FPS	649 FPS
medium	211 FPS	524 FPS
high	174 FPS	436 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	386 FPS
1440p
low	195 FPS	544 FPS
medium	177 FPS	455 FPS
high	151 FPS	388 FPS
ultra	116 FPS	329 FPS
4K
low	121 FPS	341 FPS
medium	112 FPS	290 FPS
high	97 FPS	271 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	232 FPS

Open EPYC 9754 Open Ryzen 5 7600X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9754	Ryzen 5 7600X
1080p
low	650 FPS	708 FPS
medium	541 FPS	652 FPS
high	481 FPS	571 FPS
ultra	422 FPS	484 FPS
1440p
low	503 FPS	708 FPS
medium	418 FPS	554 FPS
high	365 FPS	479 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	409 FPS
4K
low	371 FPS	463 FPS
medium	289 FPS	392 FPS
high	246 FPS	341 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	281 FPS

Open EPYC 9754 Open Ryzen 5 7600X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9754	Ryzen 5 7600X
1080p
low	876 FPS	708 FPS
medium	793 FPS	708 FPS
high	682 FPS	708 FPS
ultra	592 FPS	708 FPS
1440p
low	695 FPS	708 FPS
medium	602 FPS	708 FPS
high	515 FPS	658 FPS
ultra	435 FPS	571 FPS
4K
low	495 FPS	560 FPS
medium	441 FPS	502 FPS
high	387 FPS	452 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	391 FPS

Open EPYC 9754 Open Ryzen 5 7600X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9754 and Ryzen 5 7600X

EPYC 9754

The EPYC 9754 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Bergamo (2023) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 98,450 points. Launch price was $11,900.

Ryzen 5 7600X

The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9754 packs 128 cores / 256 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 9754 has 122 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 9754 versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X — a 52.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 2.25 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The EPYC 9754 uses the Bergamo (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9754 scores 98,450 against the Ryzen 5 7600X's 28,325 — a 110.6% lead for the EPYC 9754. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 104,584 vs 15,300 (149% advantage for the EPYC 9754). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,634 vs 2,900, a 55.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 16,825 vs 13,800 (19.8% advantage for the EPYC 9754). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9754 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X.

Feature	EPYC 9754	Ryzen 5 7600X
Cores / Threads	128 / 256+2033%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	5.3 GHz+71%
Base Clock	2.25 GHz	4.7 GHz+109%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+700%	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	6 MB+500%
Process	5 nm	5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture	Bergamo (2023)	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
PassMark	98,450+248%	28,325
Cinebench R23 Multi	104,584+584%	15,300
Geekbench 6 Single	1,634	2,900+77%
Geekbench 6 Multi	16,825+22%	13,800

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9754 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Ryzen 5 7600X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9754) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 7600X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9754) vs 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) — the EPYC 9754 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9754) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X).

Feature	EPYC 9754	Ryzen 5 7600X
Socket	SP5	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+4700%	128 GB
RAM Channels	12+500%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+357%	28

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9754) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X). The Ryzen 5 7600X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the EPYC 9754 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 9754 targets Data Center / Cloud Native, Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 9754 rivals Xeon 6780E; Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.

Feature	EPYC 9754	Ryzen 5 7600X
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	AMD-V
Target Use	Data Center / Cloud Native	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9754 launched at $11900 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 7600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($11900 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 7600X is $11601 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9754 delivers 8.3 pts/$ vs 94.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 7600X — making the Ryzen 5 7600X the 167.9% better value option.