
EPYC 9684X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9684X
2023Why buy it
- ✅+255.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+1100% larger total L3 cache (1.1 GB vs 96 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 96 cores / 192 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($14,756 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 400W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +48.0% higher average FPS across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $14,307 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $14,756 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 823.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $14,756 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 400W, a 280W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9684X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,293 vs 122,017).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 1.1 GB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9684X, which brings 96 cores / 192 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 9684X
2023Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅+255.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+1100% larger total L3 cache (1.1 GB vs 96 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 96 cores / 192 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +48.0% higher average FPS across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $14,307 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $14,756 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 823.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $14,756 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 400W, a 280W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9684X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($14,756 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 400W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,293 vs 122,017).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 1.1 GB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9684X, which brings 96 cores / 192 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than EPYC 9684X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9684X | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9684X | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 737 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 416 FPS | 722 FPS |
| medium | 372 FPS | 611 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 500 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 398 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 256 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 233 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 273 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9684X | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 519 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 452 FPS | 857 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 509 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 423 FPS | 851 FPS |
| high | 388 FPS | 786 FPS |
| ultra | 335 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 362 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9684X | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 902 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 822 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 708 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 623 FPS | 782 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 628 FPS | 760 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 669 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 517 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 462 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 348 FPS | 428 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9684X and Ryzen 7 7800X3D

EPYC 9684X
EPYC 9684X
The EPYC 9684X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 1152 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 122,017 points. Launch price was $14,756.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9684X packs 96 cores / 192 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9684X has 88 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9684X versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 29.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 2.55 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The EPYC 9684X uses the Genoa-X (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9684X scores 122,017 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 112.2% lead for the EPYC 9684X. L3 cache: 1152 MB (total) on the EPYC 9684X vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | EPYC 9684X | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 96 / 192+1100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 5 GHz+35% |
| Base Clock | 2.55 GHz | 4.4 GHz+73% |
| L3 Cache | 1152 MB (total)+1100% | 96 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa-X (2023) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 122,017+256% | 34,293 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9684X uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9684X) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9684X) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — the EPYC 9684X offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9684X) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D).
| Feature | EPYC 9684X | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+4700% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9684X) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the EPYC 9684X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 9684X targets HPC / Cache Sensitive Workloads, Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 9684X rivals Xeon 6979P; Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | EPYC 9684X | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V |
| Target Use | HPC / Cache Sensitive Workloads | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9684X launched at $14756 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D debuted at $449. On MSRP ($14756 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is $14307 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9684X delivers 8.3 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — making the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the 160.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9684X | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $14756 | $449-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.3 | 76.4+820% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












