
EPYC 9684X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9684X
2023Why buy it
- ✅+358.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+3500% larger total L3 cache (1.1 GB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 96 cores / 192 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($14,756 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌515.4% higher power demand at 400W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $14,457 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $14,756 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 976.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $14,756 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 400W, a 335W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 122,017).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 1.1 GB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9684X, which brings 96 cores / 192 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9684X moves to SP5 and DDR5.
EPYC 9684X
2023Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+358.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+3500% larger total L3 cache (1.1 GB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 96 cores / 192 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $14,457 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $14,756 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 976.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $14,756 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 400W, a 335W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($14,756 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌515.4% higher power demand at 400W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 122,017).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 1.1 GB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9684X, which brings 96 cores / 192 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9684X moves to SP5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than EPYC 9684X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9684X | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9684X | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 404 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 416 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 372 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 350 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 256 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 233 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 245 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9684X | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 519 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 452 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 509 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 423 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 388 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 335 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 402 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 229 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9684X | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 902 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 822 FPS | 665 FPS |
| high | 708 FPS | 665 FPS |
| ultra | 623 FPS | 665 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 628 FPS | 665 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 607 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 533 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 517 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 462 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 439 FPS |
| ultra | 348 FPS | 385 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9684X and Ryzen 7 5700X

EPYC 9684X
EPYC 9684X
The EPYC 9684X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 1152 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 122,017 points. Launch price was $14,756.


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9684X packs 96 cores / 192 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9684X has 88 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9684X versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 2.55 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The EPYC 9684X uses the Genoa-X (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9684X scores 122,017 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 — a 128.4% lead for the EPYC 9684X. L3 cache: 1152 MB (total) on the EPYC 9684X vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X.
| Feature | EPYC 9684X | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 96 / 192+1100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.6 GHz+24% |
| Base Clock | 2.55 GHz | 3.4 GHz+33% |
| L3 Cache | 1152 MB (total)+3500% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa-X (2023) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 122,017+359% | 26,609 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 14,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,116 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 9,715 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9684X uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9684X versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X — the EPYC 9684X supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9684X) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9684X) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) — the EPYC 9684X offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9684X) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X).
| Feature | EPYC 9684X | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+4700% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9684X) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X). Primary use case: EPYC 9684X targets HPC / Cache Sensitive Workloads, Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 9684X rivals Xeon 6979P; Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | EPYC 9684X | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V |
| Target Use | HPC / Cache Sensitive Workloads | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9684X launched at $14756 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5700X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($14756 vs $299), the Ryzen 7 5700X is $14457 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9684X delivers 8.3 pts/$ vs 89.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5700X — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 166% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9684X | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $14756 | $299-98% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.3 | 89.0+972% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












