EPYC 9555 vs EPYC 9655P

AMD

EPYC 9555

64 Cores128 Thrd360 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2024

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

EPYC 9655P

96 Cores192 Thrd400 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2024

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9555

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $985 less on MSRP ($9,826 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9655P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (133,253 vs 160,490).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 14.8 PassMark/$ ($9,826 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).

EPYC 9655P

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Delivers 9.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($10,811 MSRP vs $9,826 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 10% HIGHER MSRP
    $10,811 MSRPvs$9,826 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9655P better than EPYC 9555?
Yes. EPYC 9655P is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 3.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 20.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9655P is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 3.3% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9655P is the better fit. You are getting 20.4% better PassMark, backed by 96 cores and 192 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9655P is the smarter buy today. EPYC 9655P is 10.0% more expensive on MSRP at $10,811 MSRP versus $9,826 MSRP, and it gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 9.5% better value on MSRP (14.8 vs 13.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9655P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 96 cores / 192 threads instead of 64/128. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 9555EPYC 9655P
1080p
low171 FPS170 FPS
medium142 FPS143 FPS
high122 FPS122 FPS
ultra99 FPS99 FPS
1440p
low150 FPS149 FPS
medium121 FPS121 FPS
high99 FPS99 FPS
ultra83 FPS83 FPS
4K
low84 FPS83 FPS
medium73 FPS73 FPS
high57 FPS57 FPS
ultra47 FPS47 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 9555EPYC 9655P
1080p
low655 FPS696 FPS
medium566 FPS602 FPS
high459 FPS475 FPS
ultra397 FPS411 FPS
1440p
low546 FPS566 FPS
medium483 FPS501 FPS
high404 FPS414 FPS
ultra328 FPS336 FPS
4K
low331 FPS331 FPS
medium295 FPS295 FPS
high268 FPS267 FPS
ultra236 FPS235 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 9555EPYC 9655P
1080p
low747 FPS746 FPS
medium634 FPS633 FPS
high590 FPS589 FPS
ultra519 FPS519 FPS
1440p
low561 FPS561 FPS
medium474 FPS474 FPS
high434 FPS434 FPS
ultra376 FPS376 FPS
4K
low405 FPS411 FPS
medium326 FPS331 FPS
high288 FPS299 FPS
ultra229 FPS238 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 9555EPYC 9655P
1080p
low1005 FPS1047 FPS
medium902 FPS939 FPS
high778 FPS821 FPS
ultra702 FPS744 FPS
1440p
low809 FPS839 FPS
medium704 FPS733 FPS
high603 FPS641 FPS
ultra533 FPS562 FPS
4K
low574 FPS605 FPS
medium510 FPS539 FPS
high447 FPS477 FPS
ultra392 FPS416 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9555 and EPYC 9655P

AMD

EPYC 9555

The EPYC 9555 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 133,253 points. Launch price was $9,826.

AMD

EPYC 9655P

The EPYC 9655P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 160,490 points. Launch price was $10,811.

Processing Power

The EPYC 9555 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9655P offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the EPYC 9655P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9555 versus 4.5 GHz on the EPYC 9655P — a 2.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 9655P (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). Both are built on the Turin (2024) architecture using a 4 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9555 scores 133,253 against the EPYC 9655P's 160,490 — a 18.5% lead for the EPYC 9655P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9555 vs 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9655P.

FeatureEPYC 9555EPYC 9655P
Cores / Threads
64 / 128
96 / 192+50%
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
4.5 GHz+2%
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+23%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)
384 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm
4 nm
Architecture
Turin (2024)
Turin (2024)
PassMark
133,253
160,490+20%
Geekbench 6 Multi
24,287
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9555) and SP5 (EPYC 9655P).

FeatureEPYC 9555EPYC 9655P
Socket
SP5
SP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6000
DDR5-6000
Max RAM Capacity
6 TB
6 TB
RAM Channels
12
12
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9555 targets Data Center, EPYC 9655P targets Data Center / Single Socket. Direct competitor: EPYC 9555 rivals Xeon 6972P; EPYC 9655P rivals Xeon 6979P.

FeatureEPYC 9555EPYC 9655P
Integrated GPU
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use
Data Center
Data Center / Single Socket
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9555 launched at $9826 MSRP, while the EPYC 9655P debuted at $10811. On MSRP ($9826 vs $10811), the EPYC 9555 is $985 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9555 delivers 13.6 pts/$ vs 14.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 9655P — making the EPYC 9655P the 9% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9555EPYC 9655P
MSRP
$9826-9%
$10811
Performance per Dollar
13.6
14.8+9%
Release Date
2024
2024