EPYC 9555P vs EPYC 9565

AMD

EPYC 9555P

64 Cores128 Thrd360 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2024

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

EPYC 9565

72 Cores144 Thrd400 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2024

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9555P

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $2,503 less on MSRP ($7,983 MSRP vs $10,486 MSRP).
  • Delivers 31.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.0 vs 12.9 PassMark/$ ($7,983 MSRP vs $10,486 MSRP).
  • Draws 360W instead of 400W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).

EPYC 9565

2024

Why buy it

  • +50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9555P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (135,221 vs 135,441).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.9 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($10,486 MSRP vs $7,983 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9555P better than EPYC 9565?
Yes. EPYC 9555P is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9555P is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 5.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9555P is the better fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9555P is the smarter buy today. EPYC 9555P is $2,503 cheaper on MSRP at $7,983 MSRP versus $10,486 MSRP, and it gives you a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 31.6% better value on MSRP (17.0 vs 12.9 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9565 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more overall headroom and a better platform outlook.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 9555PEPYC 9565
1080p
low171 FPS171 FPS
medium142 FPS142 FPS
high122 FPS121 FPS
ultra99 FPS98 FPS
1440p
low150 FPS150 FPS
medium121 FPS120 FPS
high99 FPS98 FPS
ultra83 FPS81 FPS
4K
low84 FPS81 FPS
medium73 FPS69 FPS
high57 FPS55 FPS
ultra47 FPS45 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 9555PEPYC 9565
1080p
low655 FPS583 FPS
medium566 FPS511 FPS
high459 FPS415 FPS
ultra397 FPS361 FPS
1440p
low546 FPS492 FPS
medium483 FPS439 FPS
high404 FPS367 FPS
ultra328 FPS302 FPS
4K
low331 FPS306 FPS
medium295 FPS276 FPS
high268 FPS249 FPS
ultra236 FPS222 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 9555PEPYC 9565
1080p
low747 FPS747 FPS
medium634 FPS634 FPS
high590 FPS575 FPS
ultra519 FPS506 FPS
1440p
low561 FPS561 FPS
medium474 FPS474 FPS
high434 FPS423 FPS
ultra376 FPS366 FPS
4K
low405 FPS405 FPS
medium326 FPS324 FPS
high288 FPS286 FPS
ultra229 FPS229 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 9555PEPYC 9565
1080p
low1005 FPS969 FPS
medium902 FPS875 FPS
high778 FPS752 FPS
ultra702 FPS676 FPS
1440p
low809 FPS780 FPS
medium704 FPS683 FPS
high603 FPS583 FPS
ultra533 FPS513 FPS
4K
low574 FPS551 FPS
medium510 FPS496 FPS
high447 FPS434 FPS
ultra392 FPS380 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9555P and EPYC 9565

AMD

EPYC 9555P

The EPYC 9555P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 135,441 points. Launch price was $7,983.

AMD

EPYC 9565

The EPYC 9565 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 72 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 3.15 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 135,221 points. Launch price was $10,486.

Processing Power

The EPYC 9555P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9565 offers 72 cores / 144 threads — the EPYC 9565 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9555P versus 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9565 — a 2.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9555P (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.15 GHz). Both are built on the Turin (2024) architecture using a 4 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9555P scores 135,441 against the EPYC 9565's 135,221 — a 0.2% lead for the EPYC 9555P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9555P vs 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9565.

FeatureEPYC 9555PEPYC 9565
Cores / Threads
64 / 128
72 / 144+13%
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+2%
4.3 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+2%
3.15 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)
384 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm
4 nm
Architecture
Turin (2024)
Turin (2024)
PassMark
135,441
135,221
Geekbench 6 Single
2,815
Geekbench 6 Multi
29,406
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9555P) and SP5 (EPYC 9565).

FeatureEPYC 9555PEPYC 9565
Socket
SP5
SP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6000
DDR5-6000
Max RAM Capacity
6 TB
6 TB
RAM Channels
12
12
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9555P targets Data Center / Single Socket, EPYC 9565 targets Data Center / Cloud Computing. Direct competitor: EPYC 9555P rivals Xeon 6979P; EPYC 9565 rivals Xeon 6972P.

FeatureEPYC 9555PEPYC 9565
Integrated GPU
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use
Data Center / Single Socket
Data Center / Cloud Computing
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9555P launched at $7983 MSRP, while the EPYC 9565 debuted at $10486. On MSRP ($7983 vs $10486), the EPYC 9555P is $2503 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9555P delivers 17.0 pts/$ vs 12.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 9565 — making the EPYC 9555P the 27.3% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9555PEPYC 9565
MSRP
$7983-24%
$10486
Performance per Dollar
17.0+32%
12.9
Release Date
2024
2024