
EPYC 9555P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9555P
2024Why buy it
- ✅+49.7% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.0 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($7,983 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 360W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $7,284 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $7,983 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 425.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $7,983 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 360W, a 240W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while EPYC 9555P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (19,643 vs 29,406).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9555P, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 9555P
2024Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅+49.7% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $7,284 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $7,983 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 425.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $7,983 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 360W, a 240W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while EPYC 9555P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.0 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($7,983 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 360W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (19,643 vs 29,406).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9555P, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than EPYC 9555P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 655 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 459 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 397 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 404 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 747 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 634 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1005 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 902 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 778 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 702 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 809 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 704 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 603 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 510 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9555P and Ryzen 9 7950X3D

EPYC 9555P
EPYC 9555P
The EPYC 9555P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 135,441 points. Launch price was $7,983.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9555P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 9555P has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9555P versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 25.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 3.2 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The EPYC 9555P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9555P scores 135,441 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 73.9% lead for the EPYC 9555P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,815 vs 2,926, a 3.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,406 vs 19,643 (39.8% advantage for the EPYC 9555P). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9555P vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+300% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.7 GHz+30% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz+31% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+100% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 135,441+117% | 62,323 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 38,581 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,815 | 2,926+4% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 29,406+50% | 19,643 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9555P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9555P) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9555P) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — the EPYC 9555P offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9555P) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D).
| Feature | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+4700% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9555P) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 9555P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 9555P targets Data Center / Single Socket. Direct competitor: EPYC 9555P rivals Xeon 6979P; Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | true |
| Target Use | Data Center / Single Socket | — |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9555P launched at $7983 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D debuted at $699. On MSRP ($7983 vs $699), the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is $7284 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9555P delivers 17.0 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — making the Ryzen 9 7950X3D the 136.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7983 | $699-91% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.0 | 89.2+425% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












