
EPYC 9555P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9555P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.0 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($7,983 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 360W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $7,534 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $7,983 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 263.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $7,983 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 360W, a 255W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9555P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 135,441).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9555P, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9555P moves to SP5 and DDR5.
EPYC 9555P
2024Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $7,534 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $7,983 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 263.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $7,983 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 360W, a 255W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.0 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($7,983 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 360W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9555P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 135,441).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9555P, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9555P moves to SP5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9555P better than Ryzen 7 5800X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 655 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 459 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 397 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 563 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 404 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 250 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 747 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 634 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1005 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 902 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 778 FPS | 693 FPS |
| ultra | 702 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 809 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 704 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 603 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 593 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 510 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 436 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9555P and Ryzen 7 5800X

EPYC 9555P
EPYC 9555P
The EPYC 9555P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 135,441 points. Launch price was $7,983.


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9555P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9555P has 56 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9555P versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 6.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 9555P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9555P scores 135,441 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 132.1% lead for the EPYC 9555P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9555P vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+700% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.7 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.8 GHz+19% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+700% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 135,441+389% | 27,712 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,815 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 29,406 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9555P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9555P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5800X — the EPYC 9555P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5800X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9555P) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 5800X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9555P) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X) — the EPYC 9555P offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9555P) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 5800X).
| Feature | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+4700% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9555P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). Primary use case: EPYC 9555P targets Data Center / Single Socket, Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 9555P rivals Xeon 6979P.
| Feature | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Data Center / Single Socket | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9555P launched at $7983 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5800X debuted at $449. On MSRP ($7983 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 5800X is $7534 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9555P delivers 17.0 pts/$ vs 61.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5800X — making the Ryzen 7 5800X the 113.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7983 | $449-94% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.0 | 61.7+263% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












