
EPYC 9555P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9555P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.0 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($7,983 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 360W vs 105W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $7,684 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $7,983 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 458.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $7,983 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 360W, a 255W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9555P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9555P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (13,800 vs 29,406).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9555P, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 9555P
2024Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $7,684 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $7,983 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 458.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $7,983 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 360W, a 255W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9555P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.0 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($7,983 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 360W vs 105W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9555P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (13,800 vs 29,406).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9555P, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9555P better than Ryzen 5 7600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 655 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 524 FPS |
| high | 459 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 397 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 455 FPS |
| high | 404 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 747 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 634 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 571 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 479 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 281 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1005 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 902 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 778 FPS | 708 FPS |
| ultra | 702 FPS | 708 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 809 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 704 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 603 FPS | 658 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 571 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 510 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 391 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9555P and Ryzen 5 7600X

EPYC 9555P
EPYC 9555P
The EPYC 9555P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 135,441 points. Launch price was $7,983.


Ryzen 5 7600X
Ryzen 5 7600X
The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9555P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 9555P has 58 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9555P versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 3.2 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The EPYC 9555P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9555P scores 135,441 against the Ryzen 5 7600X's 28,325 — a 130.8% lead for the EPYC 9555P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,815 vs 2,900, a 3% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,406 vs 13,800 (72.2% advantage for the EPYC 9555P). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9555P vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X.
| Feature | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+967% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.3 GHz+20% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.7 GHz+47% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+700% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 6 MB+500% |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 135,441+378% | 28,325 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 15,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,815 | 2,900+3% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 29,406+113% | 13,800 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9555P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen 5 7600X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9555P) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 7600X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9555P) vs 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) — the EPYC 9555P offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9555P) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X).
| Feature | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+4700% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9555P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X). The Ryzen 5 7600X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the EPYC 9555P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 9555P targets Data Center / Single Socket, Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 9555P rivals Xeon 6979P; Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Data Center / Single Socket | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9555P launched at $7983 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 7600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($7983 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 7600X is $7684 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9555P delivers 17.0 pts/$ vs 94.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 7600X — making the Ryzen 5 7600X the 139.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7983 | $299-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.0 | 94.7+457% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












