
EPYC 9555
Popular choices:

EPYC 9555P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9555
2024Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (133,253 vs 135,441).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($9,826 MSRP vs $7,983 MSRP).
EPYC 9555P
2024Why buy it
- ✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $1,843 less on MSRP ($7,983 MSRP vs $9,826 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.0 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($7,983 MSRP vs $9,826 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
EPYC 9555
2024EPYC 9555P
2024Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $1,843 less on MSRP ($7,983 MSRP vs $9,826 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.0 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($7,983 MSRP vs $9,826 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (133,253 vs 135,441).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($9,826 MSRP vs $7,983 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9555P better than EPYC 9555?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9555 | EPYC 9555P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9555 | EPYC 9555P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 655 FPS | 655 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 566 FPS |
| high | 459 FPS | 459 FPS |
| ultra | 397 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 404 FPS | 404 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 331 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 236 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9555 | EPYC 9555P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 747 FPS | 747 FPS |
| medium | 634 FPS | 634 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 590 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 519 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 376 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 229 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9555 | EPYC 9555P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1005 FPS | 1005 FPS |
| medium | 902 FPS | 902 FPS |
| high | 778 FPS | 778 FPS |
| ultra | 702 FPS | 702 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 809 FPS | 809 FPS |
| medium | 704 FPS | 704 FPS |
| high | 603 FPS | 603 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 533 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 510 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 392 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9555 and EPYC 9555P

EPYC 9555
EPYC 9555
The EPYC 9555 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 133,253 points. Launch price was $9,826.

EPYC 9555P
EPYC 9555P
The EPYC 9555P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 135,441 points. Launch price was $7,983.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 9555 and EPYC 9555P share an identical 64-core/128-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9555 versus 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9555P — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). Both are built on the Turin (2024) architecture using a 4 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9555 scores 133,253 against the EPYC 9555P's 135,441 — a 1.6% lead for the EPYC 9555P. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 9555 | EPYC 9555P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128 | 64 / 128 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 133,253 | 135,441+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,815 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 29,406 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9555) and SP5 (EPYC 9555P).
| Feature | EPYC 9555 | EPYC 9555P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-6000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB | 6 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9555 targets Data Center, EPYC 9555P targets Data Center / Single Socket. Direct competitor: EPYC 9555 rivals Xeon 6972P; EPYC 9555P rivals Xeon 6979P.
| Feature | EPYC 9555 | EPYC 9555P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Data Center | Data Center / Single Socket |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9555 launched at $9826 MSRP, while the EPYC 9555P debuted at $7983. On MSRP ($9826 vs $7983), the EPYC 9555P is $1843 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9555 delivers 13.6 pts/$ vs 17.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 9555P — making the EPYC 9555P the 22.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9555 | EPYC 9555P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $9826 | $7983-19% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.6 | 17.0+25% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













