
EPYC 9555
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9555
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($9,826 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌453.8% higher power demand at 360W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $9,627 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $9,826 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 555.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $9,826 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 360W, a 295W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 9555.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9555 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 133,253).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9555, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9555 moves to SP5 and DDR5.
EPYC 9555
2024Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $9,627 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $9,826 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 555.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $9,826 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 360W, a 295W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 9555.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($9,826 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌453.8% higher power demand at 360W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9555 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 133,253).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9555, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9555 moves to SP5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9555 better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9555 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9555 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 655 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 459 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 397 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 404 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 263 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 201 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9555 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 747 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 634 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 432 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 242 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9555 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1005 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 902 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 778 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 702 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 809 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 704 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 603 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 510 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 357 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9555 and Ryzen 5 3600

EPYC 9555
EPYC 9555
The EPYC 9555 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 133,253 points. Launch price was $9,826.


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9555 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 9555 has 58 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9555 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 4.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 9555 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 9555 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9555 scores 133,253 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 153.1% lead for the EPYC 9555. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9555 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | EPYC 9555 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+967% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+5% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+700% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 133,253+653% | 17,685 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,295 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9555 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9555 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the EPYC 9555 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9555) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 3600). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9555) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the EPYC 9555 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9555) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).
| Feature | EPYC 9555 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+4700% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9555) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). Primary use case: EPYC 9555 targets Data Center, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9555 rivals Xeon 6972P; Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | EPYC 9555 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | Yes |
| Target Use | Data Center | Gaming/Budget Workstation |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9555 launched at $9826 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 3600 debuted at $199. On MSRP ($9826 vs $199), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $9627 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9555 delivers 13.6 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 147% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9555 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $9826 | $199-98% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.6 | 88.9+554% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












