PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9475F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.1 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($7,592 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
❌281% higher power demand at 400W vs 105W.

Ryzen 7 5800X

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $7,143 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $7,592 MSRP).
✅Delivers 282.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 16.1 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $7,592 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 400W, a 295W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9475F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 122,476).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9475F, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9475F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9475F

2024

Ryzen 7 5800X

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Costs $7,143 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $7,592 MSRP).
✅Delivers 282.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 16.1 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $7,592 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 400W, a 295W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.1 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($7,592 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
❌281% higher power demand at 400W vs 105W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9475F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 122,476).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9475F, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9475F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9475F better than Ryzen 7 5800X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 9475F makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 5800X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9475F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 18.9% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 256 MB vs 32 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9475F is the better fit. You are getting 342% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9475F is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 5800X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 9475F is 1590.9% more expensive on MSRP at $7,592 MSRP versus $449 MSRP, and it gives you a 18.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 5800X is also 282.6% better value on MSRP (61.7 vs 16.1 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9475F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 256 MB L3 cache instead of 32 MB, more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9475F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 5800X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9475F	Ryzen 7 5800X
1080p
low	315 FPS	206 FPS
medium	289 FPS	178 FPS
high	240 FPS	146 FPS
ultra	203 FPS	110 FPS
1440p
low	278 FPS	170 FPS
medium	230 FPS	142 FPS
high	178 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	157 FPS	88 FPS
4K
low	191 FPS	83 FPS
medium	157 FPS	74 FPS
high	120 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	46 FPS

Open EPYC 9475F Open Ryzen 7 5800X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9475F	Ryzen 7 5800X
1080p
low	725 FPS	662 FPS
medium	618 FPS	558 FPS
high	485 FPS	466 FPS
ultra	421 FPS	417 FPS
1440p
low	579 FPS	563 FPS
medium	510 FPS	493 FPS
high	419 FPS	423 FPS
ultra	341 FPS	361 FPS
4K
low	338 FPS	350 FPS
medium	300 FPS	308 FPS
high	270 FPS	288 FPS
ultra	239 FPS	250 FPS

Open EPYC 9475F Open Ryzen 7 5800X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9475F	Ryzen 7 5800X
1080p
low	906 FPS	693 FPS
medium	738 FPS	651 FPS
high	668 FPS	570 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	464 FPS
1440p
low	702 FPS	693 FPS
medium	570 FPS	573 FPS
high	503 FPS	498 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	413 FPS
4K
low	496 FPS	484 FPS
medium	411 FPS	410 FPS
high	365 FPS	363 FPS
ultra	302 FPS	302 FPS

Open EPYC 9475F Open Ryzen 7 5800X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9475F	Ryzen 7 5800X
1080p
low	1139 FPS	693 FPS
medium	1015 FPS	693 FPS
high	901 FPS	693 FPS
ultra	812 FPS	693 FPS
1440p
low	888 FPS	693 FPS
medium	782 FPS	693 FPS
high	687 FPS	672 FPS
ultra	598 FPS	593 FPS
4K
low	648 FPS	604 FPS
medium	578 FPS	550 FPS
high	513 FPS	495 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	436 FPS

Open EPYC 9475F Open Ryzen 7 5800X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9475F and Ryzen 7 5800X

EPYC 9475F

The EPYC 9475F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 122,476 points. Launch price was $7,592.

Ryzen 7 5800X

The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9475F packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9475F has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9475F versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 2.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 9475F (base: 3.65 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 9475F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9475F scores 122,476 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 126.2% lead for the EPYC 9475F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9475F vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.

Feature	EPYC 9475F	Ryzen 7 5800X
Cores / Threads	48 / 96+500%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+2%	4.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.65 GHz	3.8 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+700%	32 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512K (per core)
Process	4 nm-43%	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
PassMark	122,476+342%	27,712
Geekbench 6 Single	1,960	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	45,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9475F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9475F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5800X — the EPYC 9475F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9475F supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9475F) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 5800X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9475F) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X) — the EPYC 9475F offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9475F) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 5800X).

Feature	EPYC 9475F	Ryzen 7 5800X
Socket	SP5	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	6144 GB+4700%	128 GB
RAM Channels	12+500%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+433%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 5800X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9475F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9475F targets Server, Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 9475F rivals Xeon 6952P.

Feature	EPYC 9475F	Ryzen 7 5800X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	AMD-V
Target Use	Server	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9475F launched at $7592 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5800X debuted at $449. On MSRP ($7592 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 5800X is $7143 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9475F delivers 16.1 pts/$ vs 61.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5800X — making the Ryzen 7 5800X the 117.1% better value option.