
EPYC 9454P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9454P
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.6 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($4,598 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌346.2% higher power demand at 290W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,399 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $4,598 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 331.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 20.6 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $4,598 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 290W, a 225W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 9454P.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9454P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,898 vs 18,576).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9454P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9454P moves to SP5 and DDR5.
EPYC 9454P
2022Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,399 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $4,598 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 331.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 20.6 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $4,598 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 290W, a 225W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 9454P.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.6 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($4,598 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌346.2% higher power demand at 290W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9454P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,898 vs 18,576).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9454P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9454P moves to SP5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9454P better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9454P | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9454P | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 303 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 438 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 263 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 201 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9454P | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 672 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 455 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 426 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 432 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 377 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 294 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 242 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9454P | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 902 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 822 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 708 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 625 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 724 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 631 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 540 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 462 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 357 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9454P and Ryzen 5 3600

EPYC 9454P
EPYC 9454P
The EPYC 9454P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 94,686 points. Launch price was $4,598.


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9454P packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 9454P has 42 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9454P versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 10% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 2.75 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 9454P uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9454P scores 94,686 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 137% lead for the EPYC 9454P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,923 vs 1,295, a 39% lead for the EPYC 9454P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,576 vs 1,898 (162.9% advantage for the EPYC 9454P). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9454P vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | EPYC 9454P | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96+700% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.2 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.75 GHz | 3.6 GHz+31% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+700% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 94,686+435% | 17,685 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,923+48% | 1,295 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,576+879% | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9454P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9454P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the EPYC 9454P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9454P) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 3600). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9454P) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the EPYC 9454P offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9454P) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).
| Feature | EPYC 9454P | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+4700% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9454P) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). Primary use case: EPYC 9454P targets Data Center / Single Socket, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9454P rivals Xeon 8468; Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | EPYC 9454P | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | Yes |
| Target Use | Data Center / Single Socket | Gaming/Budget Workstation |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9454P launched at $4598 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 3600 debuted at $199. On MSRP ($4598 vs $199), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $4399 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9454P delivers 20.6 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 124.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9454P | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4598 | $199-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.6 | 88.9+332% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












