
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

EPYC 9374F
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,676 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 563.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 320W, a 255W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 9374F.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9374F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 82,009).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9374F, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 9374F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +31.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($4,850 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ❌392.3% higher power demand at 320W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022EPYC 9374F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,676 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 563.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 320W, a 255W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 9374F.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +31.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9374F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 82,009).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9374F, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($4,850 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ❌392.3% higher power demand at 320W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9374F better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 9374F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 48 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 9374F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 637 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 392 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 538 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 478 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 397 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 327 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 300 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 269 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 240 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 9374F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 817 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 690 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 624 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 545 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 616 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 518 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 461 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 395 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 352 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 247 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 9374F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 1138 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 875 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 784 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 880 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 774 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 654 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 570 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 425 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and EPYC 9374F

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

EPYC 9374F
EPYC 9374F
The EPYC 9374F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,009 points. Launch price was $4,850.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the EPYC 9374F offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 9374F has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9374F — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.85 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 9374F uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the EPYC 9374F's 82,009 — a 123.1% lead for the EPYC 9374F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9374F.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 9374F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 32 / 64+433% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+2% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.85 GHz+54% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+1322% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 82,009+320% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 9374F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus 4800 on the EPYC 9374F — the EPYC 9374F supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9374F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-12400F) vs 12 (EPYC 9374F). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 128 (EPYC 9374F) — the EPYC 9374F offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and SP5 (EPYC 9374F).
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 9374F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | 4800+95900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+2184433% | 6144 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 12+500% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9374F). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; EPYC 9374F rivals Xeon Platinum 8480+.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 9374F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the EPYC 9374F debuted at $4850. On MSRP ($174 vs $4850), the Core i5-12400F is $4676 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 16.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 9374F — making the Core i5-12400F the 147.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 9374F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174-96% | $4850 |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3+564% | 16.9 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












