PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7702P

2019

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Draws 200W instead of 210W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9334 across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (63,692 vs 65,568).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($4,425 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9334 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9334

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.5% higher average FPS across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,435 less on MSRP ($2,990 MSRP vs $4,425 MSRP).
✅Delivers 52.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 14.4 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $4,425 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).

EPYC 7702P

2019

EPYC 9334

2022

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Draws 200W instead of 210W, a 10W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.5% higher average FPS across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,435 less on MSRP ($2,990 MSRP vs $4,425 MSRP).
✅Delivers 52.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 14.4 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $4,425 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9334 across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (63,692 vs 65,568).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($4,425 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9334 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9334 better than EPYC 7702P?

Yes. EPYC 9334 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 8.5% average FPS lead across 42 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9334 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 8.5% more average FPS across 42 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9334 is the better fit. You are getting 2.9% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9334 is the smarter buy today. EPYC 9334 is $1,435 cheaper on MSRP at $2,990 MSRP versus $4,425 MSRP, and it gives you a 8.5% average FPS lead across 42 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 52.4% better value on MSRP (21.9 vs 14.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9334 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of TR4, more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 64/128, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7702P Benchmark Check

EPYC 9334 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7702P	EPYC 9334
1080p
low	192 FPS	170 FPS
medium	172 FPS	141 FPS
high	138 FPS	122 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	157 FPS	148 FPS
medium	132 FPS	120 FPS
high	101 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	72 FPS	70 FPS
medium	65 FPS	59 FPS
high	50 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	39 FPS

Open EPYC 7702P Open EPYC 9334

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7702P	EPYC 9334
1080p
low	247 FPS	533 FPS
medium	221 FPS	465 FPS
high	183 FPS	373 FPS
ultra	148 FPS	303 FPS
1440p
low	202 FPS	438 FPS
medium	186 FPS	392 FPS
high	158 FPS	323 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	255 FPS
4K
low	126 FPS	270 FPS
medium	118 FPS	246 FPS
high	103 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	179 FPS

Open EPYC 7702P Open EPYC 9334

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7702P	EPYC 9334
1080p
low	629 FPS	646 FPS
medium	536 FPS	538 FPS
high	486 FPS	501 FPS
ultra	415 FPS	436 FPS
1440p
low	524 FPS	502 FPS
medium	446 FPS	417 FPS
high	394 FPS	382 FPS
ultra	338 FPS	330 FPS
4K
low	389 FPS	374 FPS
medium	312 FPS	291 FPS
high	274 FPS	260 FPS
ultra	224 FPS	208 FPS

Open EPYC 7702P Open EPYC 9334

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7702P	EPYC 9334
1080p
low	904 FPS	856 FPS
medium	823 FPS	786 FPS
high	706 FPS	678 FPS
ultra	610 FPS	598 FPS
1440p
low	711 FPS	689 FPS
medium	620 FPS	605 FPS
high	530 FPS	518 FPS
ultra	450 FPS	443 FPS
4K
low	503 FPS	494 FPS
medium	452 FPS	445 FPS
high	398 FPS	391 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	336 FPS

Open EPYC 7702P Open EPYC 9334

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7702P and EPYC 9334

EPYC 7702P

The EPYC 7702P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 63,692 points. Launch price was $4,425.

EPYC 9334

The EPYC 9334 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,568 points. Launch price was $2,990.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7702P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9334 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7702P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7702P versus 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9334 — a 15.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 9334 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 7702P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the EPYC 9334 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7702P scores 63,692 against the EPYC 9334's 65,568 — a 2.9% lead for the EPYC 9334. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7702P vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9334.

Feature	EPYC 7702P	EPYC 9334
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+100%	32 / 64
Boost Clock	3.35 GHz	3.9 GHz+16%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.7 GHz+35%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+100%	128 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	5 nm, 6 nm-29%
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark	63,692	65,568+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7702P uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9334 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7702P versus 4800 on the EPYC 9334 — the EPYC 9334 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9334 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7702P) vs 12 (EPYC 9334). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7702P) and SP5 (EPYC 9334).

Feature	EPYC 7702P	EPYC 9334
Socket	TR4	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	6144+50%
RAM Channels	8	12+50%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9334 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7702P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 9334 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.

Feature	EPYC 7702P	EPYC 9334
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7702P launched at $4425 MSRP, while the EPYC 9334 debuted at $2990. On MSRP ($4425 vs $2990), the EPYC 9334 is $1435 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7702P delivers 14.4 pts/$ vs 21.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 9334 — making the EPYC 9334 the 41.5% better value option.