EPYC 9115 vs EPYC 9184X

AMD

EPYC 9115

16 Cores32 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2024

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

EPYC 9184X

16 Cores32 Thrd320 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9115

2024

Why buy it

  • +1.4% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $4,202 less on MSRP ($726 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
  • Delivers 588.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 66.6 vs 9.7 PassMark/$ ($726 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
  • Draws 125W instead of 320W, a 195W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9184X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.

EPYC 9184X

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +11.4% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (47,665 vs 48,343).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.7 vs 66.6 PassMark/$ ($4,928 MSRP vs $726 MSRP).
  • 156% higher power demand at 320W vs 125W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9115 better than EPYC 9184X?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, EPYC 9184X is ahead with a 11.4% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9115 pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark. EPYC 9184X also has the bigger cache pool with 1100% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 64 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9115 is the better fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9115 is the smarter buy today. EPYC 9115 is $4,202 cheaper on MSRP at $726 MSRP versus $4,928 MSRP, and it gives you 1.4% better PassMark. The trade-off is that EPYC 9184X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 11.4% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 588.4% better value on MSRP (66.6 vs 9.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9115 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 16/32. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 9115EPYC 9184X
1080p
low164 FPS169 FPS
medium135 FPS138 FPS
high114 FPS118 FPS
ultra90 FPS94 FPS
1440p
low144 FPS149 FPS
medium116 FPS119 FPS
high93 FPS96 FPS
ultra74 FPS78 FPS
4K
low68 FPS70 FPS
medium58 FPS59 FPS
high46 FPS47 FPS
ultra37 FPS39 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 9115EPYC 9184X
1080p
low490 FPS576 FPS
medium436 FPS504 FPS
high338 FPS409 FPS
ultra291 FPS357 FPS
1440p
low422 FPS484 FPS
medium380 FPS431 FPS
high305 FPS360 FPS
ultra247 FPS298 FPS
4K
low264 FPS300 FPS
medium240 FPS271 FPS
high208 FPS244 FPS
ultra182 FPS219 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 9115EPYC 9184X
1080p
low707 FPS746 FPS
medium592 FPS632 FPS
high538 FPS575 FPS
ultra478 FPS506 FPS
1440p
low545 FPS557 FPS
medium454 FPS470 FPS
high407 FPS420 FPS
ultra355 FPS364 FPS
4K
low397 FPS402 FPS
medium318 FPS321 FPS
high281 FPS284 FPS
ultra228 FPS228 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 9115EPYC 9184X
1080p
low860 FPS958 FPS
medium785 FPS867 FPS
high679 FPS738 FPS
ultra601 FPS653 FPS
1440p
low680 FPS754 FPS
medium601 FPS657 FPS
high516 FPS556 FPS
ultra447 FPS481 FPS
4K
low495 FPS534 FPS
medium445 FPS477 FPS
high391 FPS420 FPS
ultra335 FPS359 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9115 and EPYC 9184X

AMD

EPYC 9115

The EPYC 9115 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,343 points. Launch price was $726.

AMD

EPYC 9184X

The EPYC 9184X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.55 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 47,665 points. Launch price was $4,928.

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 9115 and EPYC 9184X share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9115 versus 4.2 GHz on the EPYC 9184X — a 2.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 9184X (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.55 GHz). The EPYC 9115 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9184X uses Genoa-X (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9115 scores 48,343 against the EPYC 9184X's 47,665 — a 1.4% lead for the EPYC 9115. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9115 vs 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9184X.

FeatureEPYC 9115EPYC 9184X
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
16 / 32
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz
4.2 GHz+2%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
3.55 GHz+37%
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)
768 MB (total)+1100%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm-20%
5 nm
Architecture
Turin (2024)
Genoa-X (2023)
PassMark
48,343+1%
47,665
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. Both support up to 6144 of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9115) and SP5 (EPYC 9184X).

FeatureEPYC 9115EPYC 9184X
Socket
SP5
SP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
4800
4800
Max RAM Capacity
6144
6144
RAM Channels
12
12
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9115 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X; EPYC 9184X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X.

FeatureEPYC 9115EPYC 9184X
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9115 launched at $726 MSRP, while the EPYC 9184X debuted at $4928. On MSRP ($726 vs $4928), the EPYC 9115 is $4202 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9115 delivers 66.6 pts/$ vs 9.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 9184X — making the EPYC 9115 the 149.3% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9115EPYC 9184X
MSRP
$726-85%
$4928
Performance per Dollar
66.6+587%
9.7
Release Date
2024
2023