
EPYC 7453
Popular choices:

EPYC 9184X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7453
2021Why buy it
- ✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $3,358 less on MSRP ($1,570 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 219.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.9 vs 9.7 PassMark/$ ($1,570 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 320W, a 95W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9184X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9184X moves to SP5 and DDR5.
EPYC 9184X
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (47,665 vs 48,453).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.7 vs 30.9 PassMark/$ ($4,928 MSRP vs $1,570 MSRP).
- ❌42.2% higher power demand at 320W vs 225W.
EPYC 7453
2021EPYC 9184X
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $3,358 less on MSRP ($1,570 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 219.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.9 vs 9.7 PassMark/$ ($1,570 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 320W, a 95W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9184X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9184X moves to SP5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (47,665 vs 48,453).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.7 vs 30.9 PassMark/$ ($4,928 MSRP vs $1,570 MSRP).
- ❌42.2% higher power demand at 320W vs 225W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7453 better than EPYC 9184X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7453 | EPYC 9184X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7453 | EPYC 9184X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 395 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 350 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 287 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 357 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 334 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 301 FPS | 431 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 298 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 300 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 219 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7453 | EPYC 9184X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 632 FPS |
| high | 471 FPS | 575 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 502 FPS | 557 FPS |
| medium | 409 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 358 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 402 FPS |
| medium | 289 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 228 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7453 | EPYC 9184X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 886 FPS | 958 FPS |
| medium | 807 FPS | 867 FPS |
| high | 696 FPS | 738 FPS |
| ultra | 611 FPS | 653 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 696 FPS | 754 FPS |
| medium | 608 FPS | 657 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 556 FPS |
| ultra | 447 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 534 FPS |
| medium | 445 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 338 FPS | 359 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7453 and EPYC 9184X

EPYC 7453
EPYC 7453
The EPYC 7453 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.45 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,453 points. Launch price was $1,570.

EPYC 9184X
EPYC 9184X
The EPYC 9184X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.55 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 47,665 points. Launch price was $4,928.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7453 packs 28 cores / 56 threads, while the EPYC 9184X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7453 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.45 GHz on the EPYC 7453 versus 4.2 GHz on the EPYC 9184X — a 19.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 9184X (base: 2.75 GHz vs 3.55 GHz). The EPYC 7453 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 9184X uses Genoa-X (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7453 scores 48,453 against the EPYC 9184X's 47,665 — a 1.6% lead for the EPYC 7453. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7453 vs 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9184X.
| Feature | EPYC 7453 | EPYC 9184X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 28 / 56+75% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.45 GHz | 4.2 GHz+22% |
| Base Clock | 2.75 GHz | 3.55 GHz+29% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 768 MB (total)+1100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Genoa-X (2023) |
| PassMark | 48,453+2% | 47,665 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7453 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9184X uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7453 versus 4800 on the EPYC 9184X — the EPYC 9184X supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9184X supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7453) vs 12 (EPYC 9184X). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3,C621A (EPYC 7453) and SP5 (EPYC 9184X).
| Feature | EPYC 7453 | EPYC 9184X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 6144+50% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7453) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 9184X). Direct competitor: EPYC 7453 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; EPYC 9184X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X.
| Feature | EPYC 7453 | EPYC 9184X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7453 launched at $1570 MSRP, while the EPYC 9184X debuted at $4928. On MSRP ($1570 vs $4928), the EPYC 7453 is $3358 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7453 delivers 30.9 pts/$ vs 9.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 9184X — making the EPYC 7453 the 104.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7453 | EPYC 9184X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1570-68% | $4928 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.9+219% | 9.7 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













